![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
I received in my Ebay inbox information on a current court case in the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Its a class action suit against Ebay alleging that eBay's automatic increase in certain circumstances of an existing bid where no competing bid had been made and increasing the bid was not necessary to meet a minimum reserve was improper and artificially inflated the bids of eBay buyers, thus causing damage to eBay buyers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
This is how I think it works: if you are the high bidder on a lot, but your high bid is an odd amount, and then you bid again, ebay raises your bid to the next regular increment. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Paul, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cat
I did that one time where I bid on a Mayo Ward card. I bid $3,012 and the previous high bidder had bid $3,000. As Paul stated, the high bid was now $3,012. I bid again to increase my max and the high bid was changed to $3,050. So bidding again cost me $38. I canceled the second bid and the high bid reverted back to the $3,012. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
When bidding without sniping, there is always a certain amount of strategy. If you look at bid history, you can tell when the high bidder is not at the right increment, meaning that you can figure out how much is needed to beat the bid. But when you raise the bid, it now shrouds the high bidder in mystery, making the next bidder wonder how high they will have to go, and possibly scaring them away. How did your experience work out here, Cat? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
Peter - you are incorrect. Ebay is making additional money. If, using the example above, no additional bids were placed except for the high bidder's own bid - then ebay has made additional money. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
JK, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
Ebay has agreed to pay a settlement of 2.1 million to be distributed among charities approved by the courts. Ebay also has agreed to pay 800,000 in plaintiffs legal fees and pay settlement for plaintiffs too. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris Counts
I have outbid myself many times on eBay without any negative consequences. Just last week, I bid $22 for a particular Batter-up. Before that, the high bid was less than $2. I really wanted the card, so I raised my bid to $28. I ended up winning the card for less than $2 ... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric B
Using the example of the Mayo Ward above. Wouldn't most people prefer Ebay do it this way rather than the bid coming back as "You Have Been Outbid Due to Not Reaching the Next Bid Increment" at $3,000.00? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Threatening legal action against Ebay it does not crack down on counterfeits | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 09-05-2007 05:02 PM |
lawsuit against psa for 10.5 million awarded to........ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 139 | 11-21-2005 05:20 AM |
LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST MASTRONET & PSA/DNA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 02-25-2005 04:51 PM |
Did you guys ( and Jules ) see this! (Hager lawsuit) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-20-2004 04:35 PM |
Ebay takes action | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-02-2003 07:36 AM |