![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
I know this was mentioned recently...but...i was just perusing the latest old cardboard and I saw this sheet again on the back cover in the maestro ad and it got me thinking...why is the sullivan card so rare as it seems to have been printed on the sheet along with the others. Any ideas? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
Maybe nobody liked Sullivan and when they got one, they threw them away. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i found it contained the 2 tougher variation young cleveland and steinfeldt corrected. i forgot to look at the nicholls and sullivan to see which variation they had. so i'm thinking in one run of printing you'd find the young/boston along with steinfeld...while the updated or corrected run will have the corrected steinfeldt along with the team change for the young. maybe i'll spend another $30 for the show tomorrow to see which variation the other 2 have (while still not buying anything). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
nichols looks to be cleveland although he does have an A on his arm and the sullivan boston...i think and cy yound cleveland. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
W513 uncut sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-26-2009 01:22 PM |
W512 uncut sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-08-2008 03:35 AM |
34 Goudey Uncut Sheet... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-22-2008 02:23 PM |
How many E93 uncut sheet out there? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-01-2006 03:55 PM |
Old Judge uncut sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-16-2003 10:11 PM |