![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jackgoodman
Didn't want to hijack Leon's thread about an authentic grade, but was wondering the following and would appreciate your opinions: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
That is my thought also. At the same time, if you know or have suspisions that a card is altered, is it ethical that someone is trying to slip an alterd card past the graders in hopes of getting a number grade? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
After receiving back a few strips as "evid. of trimming", to eliminate weeks in transit, I now add the line 'If ungradeable, please Authenticate'. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian E.
I did the same thing on my last two submissions; I made a note on the submission form that if a numerical grade cannot be given, please slab as authentic. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I have always resisted putting the "please grade any card as auth that doesnt receive a numrical grade" for that very reason - they might think there was something wrong. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
Josh, agreed. I should qualify my last reply. I'll request "Auth. if Ungradeable" only on hand-cuts (I love those scraps). I own no regular issues that are graded Auth., but wouldn't mind that Plank. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I was all in favor of the authentic grade. Now I am not because the way it has played out has been that any piece of crap, no matter how altered, is being labeled authentic. I've seen cards with trimmed borders slabbed as authentic, cards with areas colored in slabbed as authentic, etc. Consequently, I no longer will have my cards labeled that way nor will I buy any cards labeled that way. The graders need to start specifying what is wrong with a card on the flip if "authentic" is to mean anything other than "altered". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
I also add the addendum that if a card is determined to be ungradeable with a numerical grade to please slab it as "authentic." I also cringe when I do this because I agree with the above posters that it is almost giving the graders an open shot to find something altered or trimmed even if you feel it is not, but I'd rather have it slabbed authentic than returned with a little note saying "evid of trimming." I believe GAI is now slabbing cards as authentic without a prior request if the issue is trimming, at least that has been my experience. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
merely on the trash I've seen as "authentic" without explanation. If the graders would only label the flips with a bit more discretion I would be ok with it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Masson
having an impact on the graders. I'll leave it to someone from SGC to explain quality control procedures, but I don't think the grader is aware of instructions on the order form. The cards are graded (including a peer review on anything controversial)and scored before they go back to data entry which enters grades and produces the labels. Data entry would match the instructions (A or no A) to the labels before passing them both along to slabbing. The slabbed cards are reviewed again before the order is complete. Long story short, what you write on the order form has no impact on how the card is graded. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
helpful info richard - thanks. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
If what you are saying is you don't think putting an "A" and/or "Authentic" grade down on the sheet you turn into SGC will have an effect on whether or not they will encapsulate with an A, I think you are incorrect. Of the 46 cards I got back last week 5 of them had an issue. I put down 4 with an "A", but not the 5th. The 4 were graded Authentic and the one I didn't denote with an "A" came back unslabbed. I know you just had some first hand experience but your situation was not the norm for grading, of course, operationally. I can verify on Monday but I think an "A" does tell them to do an Authentic holder, otherwise they won't holder a card with an issue.....at least that's my recent experience. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
when they are asked to authenticate cards. I saw that at the National last year. What they do in the event of "A if not numerically graded" I don't know. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
The "A" means Altered, not authentic. There is a key to all the letter designations on the website. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Masson
Leon, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Yes, I agree with you on that point. The graders, themselves, don't see the submission sheets when grading..... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone else having problems placing "last-minute" bids on Ebay lately? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-28-2007 07:19 PM |
Where is the line between a "1" and "Authentic"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-02-2006 04:21 PM |
The Problems with Slabbing "packs" - Piedmont | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-16-2006 03:44 PM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |