![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
Could someone buy one of these cards and sue the company for knowingly encasing fake cards? There's no way this card can be real. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
That is pretty scary. And did you notice that two of the three bidders have a "0" feedback? Whenever you see this stuff bidders with "0" ratings always seem to be especially active. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
Can someone point out how to tell this is not real? I'm not that familiar w/Goudeys. But I thought that CSA was a decent grading company from awhile back. I might have them confused with a different company. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Robert
THe card is most likely real but trimmed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: whycough
This card is being offered by Mile High Card Company: a long time reputable dealer. You figure this one out for me; I'm at a loss. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
I figured it was fake just by seeing how vibrantly white the card is. Maybe the contrast of the image was turned up, but no other Goudeys that I've seen online look as white as that one. The card almost looks plastic to me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: sagard
I would guess this a consignment. Real but no doubt a little small. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
The colors of the card seem off. Is it badly faded? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
It's very possible that they photoshopped the card to make the white look brighter. Remember the 38 DiMaggio about 6 months ago that had been photoshopped to make the card whiter? Could be the same thing, but I am with Barry, the colors look wrong. The red also seem unusually washed out. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
i think the card is authentic. but the issue here is the faded front and is it trimmed? i would guess that it was hand cut from a sheet after it was displayed on a wall for a while. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PC
What's odd about that auction is that it does not have the usual "Mile High" banner or the name anywhere in the listing description, and the "me" link does not go back to Mile High Cards. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Dawson
"Due to concerns, this card is being sold AS IS for the following reasons: We feel the card has been trimmed and possibly bleached, and is being sold as a baseball collectible rather than a 1933 Goudey #144 Babe Ruth NM-MT baseball card." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
That's a fair and professional response, but the bid is already $510. Too high under the circumstances. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA = Awful | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 47 | 02-16-2008 05:19 PM |
What if grading companies could do this??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-20-2007 09:17 PM |
I got shut out of Mastro & Some prices that shocked you | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 04-30-2007 11:11 PM |
Doesnt this seem like an awful lot for a Goudey common??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-11-2003 05:04 PM |
Awful lot of card collectors dying lately | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-24-2003 07:02 PM |