![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
Hi Everyone, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marc S.
Obviously with the advent of Photoshop - a scan is not very compelling to say the least. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
Couldn't agree more with you on the topic of photoshop. I ofcourse emailed PSA and will hope to hear the best from them. If I did decide to resend it, atleast it couldn't hurt sending in the scan of the card. Would be nice if I owned it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Kyle, that's a good concern/post. Consistency seems to be something that is lacking when it comes to grading services and different card issues. This isn't only a PSA thing, this also goes back to SGC. What is the criteria for an AUTHENTIC label or an actual grade when it comes to strip cards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
The card I submitted was a 1925 W590 Robert T. Jones Jr. (Bobby Jones!). I sent the card to PSA almost a month ago, and it was not graded because of insufficient information. Thanks to another collector, I was able to resubmit with documentation. That same collector also submitted his and ended up with the PSA 5, and mine an Authentic, though if you looked at the two cards together, you'd hardly tell a difference in size and cut, except for mine being cut straighter. So sending a card to PSA for a third time is probably foolish, but with the current 5 day/$13 dollar special, it'd only cost another $30 and perhaps a numerical grade will come out of it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
that consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike Campbell
In the past month or so, I have had several cards returned to me, that the graders would not grade or encapsulate. Reason? Too big or too small. Not trimmed, not altered, not cut too small, or too big, not tampered with in any way. These are legitimate cards from the teens, 20's and 30's. This really annoys me. This has happened to me 5 or 6 times in the past year. So....I will forward on to another grader. Hopefully they can do their job. One last thing.....it isn't so much that I am looking for the grade, I know what the grade is, or should be, but what I am trying to do is protect them from damage. And allow me to pass them around, when I do public presentations on baseball memorabilia, and history. Now i know I could do that myself, but, shouldn't the grading companies do it? After all, I am paying them. Or at least trying to. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
If they saw your card and another identical card at the same time and graded the other one and gave yours at "authentic" grade, there must be a reason for this determination. Sending a scan of the other one along with yours won't change their minds. Talking to them at a show or resubmitting it at a show might work. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
Hey Jim, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Graded Review Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-09-2009 09:23 AM |
OPC vintage psa graded inc ryan/seaver psa 10 pop 1! | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-14-2008 03:47 PM |
Vintage Baseball Card book review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 08-22-2007 11:59 AM |
About.com: Let's Review Their Baseball Card Timeline | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-23-2007 12:36 PM |
PSA review question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-01-2007 11:28 PM |