![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
This is PATHETIC! A professional grading company making a $1000 mistake on a label. I don't care what you grading CULT members say, grading is a JOKE! And PSA is at the top of the JOKE list. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: will watson
don't hold back, tell us how you really feel! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Ive bought a lot of stuff from yorktown and generally think they are a good/honest seller. I dont know much about the t205s, but I take it that the "no stray line" card is common and not worth much. If correct, it seems to me that in this particular case, Yorktown also has some responsibility for this card selling for more than its worth. While they have noted the mistake in the listing, the title states that it is the "stray line" variety. This has undoubtably caused people to bid without reading the rest of the listing and is misleading to say the least. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
They just added to the description. For some reason, Yorktown never scans reverses. Anyway, thanks to Art Martinea, I retracted my bid. And Will, if you knew me, you would know that is exactly what I do, call it how I see it w/o holding back. And I back whatever I say. That is why Doug Allen told Joe Orlando I would not be going away easily when PSA ripped me off. I would have flown out to California a hundred times for court, it was principle at that point! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Yes, they make the correction in the description. But it should have been made in the title or the auction should have been cancelled and relisted. The bidding clearly reflects that the bidders didnt read the description and believe they are bidding on the stray line variety. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
Sorry, but they don't improve up close and personal, either. I've bought so FEW PSA graded cards, and such a large % of them were mislabled, misgraded--what a MESS!!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Dan,
Presto, the card never existed nor did they make the mistake! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Damian Anderson
stray line of type variation? What it is a result of and what kind of premium are we talking here? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: George H. Counter
"...is run by a complete spineless idiot! JOE ORLANDO." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DJ
C'mon, that's why some of us read! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
As long as you put your name by your remarks, and stand behind them, you can say just about whatever you want to...to a certain point. Joe Orlando is a public figure and public figures take heat sometimes. As far as lurkers not posting...that's ok too. I don't really care to grow this site...just maintain what we have by the family we have made here....regards |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
George; |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Dan's comments are ON topic to the thread.... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: George H. Counter
"...Personal attacks are way off topic" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Dan -- I can't say that I agree that grading is a "joke", but you'd get no argument from me about Mister Orlando. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I don't know Joe O so can't state anything about him. I do know Dan though and can say he's a pretty good guy. I try not to censor and take things on a case by case basis, as history will show. Personal attacks are, for the most part, off topic, so you are correct about that. This one stays and Joe can come defend himself if he wants to. regards |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: owner of the Dan Kottles card collection ~
would you like a picture of Joe you have never seen before? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
George, I respect your opinion and I don't blast as much as I used too as I am only out $1800 legal fees and travel and a 1 week vacation. I blasted Joe alot more when I was out the $5K. Sorry but I have no respect for the guy and yes, he is more than welcome to come on and defend himself. After he received the verdict of the 2nd and final trial, he called me and stated "no hard feelings, PSA deals with alot of strange people but I saw you were professional" Well that is great but, if that was truly the case, then he wouldn't have appealed the small claims verdict because I was just as professional then as well. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
And Brian, I really have no desire to see Joe naked butthanks anyway. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I am in the middle of a deal with them and they seem like good guys to me. They also ended the auction that started this thread....regards |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: George H. Counter
Dan, thanks for deleting the last part of your message. I think it was the best way to go. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Personally, I don't like the decision Dan made to delete the Joe Orlando comments. Reeks too much of censorship and cowtowing to keep from hurting people's feelings. As Leon said, Orlando is a public figure and Dan is willing to stand behind his statements. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
I thought hard about it Jay but since I too didn't know George, I didn't want to shrug away a possibly new fellow with my negative statements. I welcome growth but am not craving it, this board has a nice size as it stands as Leon said. So, I rarely do that and I do stand behind everything I say, but felt I had offended George and that made my decision. Dan. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DJ
I'm kind of on Jay on this one. If you have the attitude that: "I'm not going to write this because it might offend one reader", than this Board will change. So if someone says "Rafael Palmeiro is a cheating liar" and I'm offended by that, the statement should be changed to please me? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I just wrote 3 paragraphs saying exactly what you just said and deleted it.....as I don't feel like continuing to justify my actions. If you have been around this board long enough, lurking or posting, then you know my thoughts. Of course I want the board to grow......but you said it for me....thanks |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: G. H. Counter
I was not offended by Dan's comments. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
No sweat George, I will take the heat for this one. But I must disagree with what you said, Joe is very welcome on this board. I would gladly accept him on and I am sure most will as well. T215's that will never be slabbed, hey, you are ok by me George. Dan. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
including Joe Orlando is welcome on this board......Obviously I wouldn't blame him for not coming on it but he is certainly welcome to. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ebay Auction - Mislabeled | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 3 | 07-15-2008 01:22 PM |
PSA MISLABELED T205 MATHEWSON / SCHAPIRA RUTH | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-19-2007 09:07 PM |
Mislabeled Elberfield Washington Portrait | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 10-02-2006 04:29 PM |
M116 - is this card mislabeled? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-06-2006 07:46 PM |
Graded Cards with Mislabeled Holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-04-2002 11:49 AM |