![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DT
wondering what the more experienced of ya'll |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
Just a guess??? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
Peck and Snider??? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob
? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
1.) Kalamazoo Bats (Giants & Mets only) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
My list would be as follows: |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
New York Baseball Club- Welton Cigars |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: murcerfan
...I did not realize the Gypsy Queen Large would rank as tough, nor the K-bat Phillies/A's so easy. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: david
i am actually working on a website to address this same issue |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt Goebel
I think most of us have the book "Classic Baseball Cards", and I always enjoy flipping through it. I've often thought that someone should do another coffee table-type book with high quality images of all these tough nineteenth century issues. Would this even be possible? I wonder if many of the secretive collectors would even share images? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
This is my take as to rarity |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
Great thread. And not even one mention of slabs throughout....hallelujah! I'd post my own list, but I think Rhett already nailed it with his. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Ben, they why did you mention slabs? You ruined it :-p |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe G.
I like Rhett's list but as already alluded to, N172s are all over the map. Depending on how you define the listing criteria (type set vs complete set, etc.), N172s could be anywhere from top to bottom. Some of the issues listed above are divided into appropriate subsets such as the Kalamazoo Bat cards. Similar division might be appropriate for Old Judges. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
...then how'd I get so many of them? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe G.
Julie, as I stated there is certainly a range of difficulty within some of the listed subsets. The script would be a good example as certain cards such as the Kelly cards with Chicago and Smiling Mickeys appear to be more common than the Spotted Ties or the Phenominal Smith etc. It is known from surviving uncut sheets that some of the script cards continued to be issued along with the later 1887 numbered cards while others likely did not. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P2 Difficulty Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-20-2007 03:29 PM |
Ranking Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-08-2006 09:22 AM |
e103 Player difficulty | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-07-2005 05:06 PM |
Ranking the difficulty of 20th Century Prewar sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-24-2005 07:20 PM |
19th century die cut issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-10-2003 01:37 PM |