![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Bob D said it best: "anything above that I don't think is worth the extra money. I kinda like my old cards to look like old cards". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chuck R
But then I finished most of the sets I was working on and decided to upgrade a few of the worst cards. Once you hold the nicer version of a card next to a real beater, it's hard not to appreciate the original quality of the card as purchased. I do understand what you're saying, though. You have to have some respect for those cards that have been well-loved...you can bond a lot more closely to one of those than something entombed in in plastic. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Seriously, you're telling me that an EX or EX/MT card wasn't "enjoyed" enough? I understand the desire to not get into ego battles that result in draining the bank account to get one card. However "collector's grade" cards in 5 or 6 condition are far desirable to me than the equivalent in a 3 or 4 condition in most instances, as long as the incremental price increase is within reason. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PASJD
HUH? (Response to original post, not to any of the responses.) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
vg-ex was fine with me, till somebody showed me a price guide...my first reaction to seeing a '54 Topps Snider with a hole in it was, "Well of course it's got a hole in it; it's old." My first reaction to seeing a PSA 9 T206 Rube Wadell portrait was "It can't possibly have looked that good straight out of the fasctory--nothing ever looked that good straight out of a factory." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collectors
best, but I settle for the 3's. I'm targeting VG-EX. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I don't have any problem with a card having any given grade (the stories of how they survived are often the most interesting things), but it is effectively impossible to collect vintage cards in high grades only, even if they are inexpensive. I started my T218 and T220 sets looking to do them ex-mt or better. Then it was ex or better. Now, it is vg-ex or better. Even the postwar cards just aren't there in top grades in many sets. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
since i don't have a lot of money and i like cards, i settle for good to vg/ex. i can buy more that way. when i see someone pay thousands for a high grade common,all i can think of is how many great vg hall of famers(or commons) i could have got for that amount. i would much rather own a complete set in g/vg than the key card of that set in mint! to me the more cards i have the better! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Higher Grade T206s (raw vs. slabbed) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-04-2009 02:27 PM |
Possibility of Crossover Getting a Higher Grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-27-2008 10:23 AM |
Selling :Two Higher Grade T202s (SGC 80 / 6) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-03-2008 06:38 PM |
Have You Ever Had A Card Grade Higher After Resubmission? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-24-2008 10:39 AM |
PSA vs. SGC: higher grade vs. nicer holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-22-2007 01:48 PM |