![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dennis W.
I realize a '52 Mantle is slightly O/T. But the real question here is how long does a seller have to stand by their card. Is a new standard for the hobby being set here? Interesting... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
I just read the case, 269 Neb 51 (I can paste it here, but it's lengthy). The most amazing part - after PSA rejected the card as altered, the buyer sent the card to ASA Accugrade. I expected the next sentence to say that ASA graded it a 10, but ASA actually rejected it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
There are so many problems with this rulling on so many many levels. The thing that especially irks me is the continued support of the court that people don't need to take responsibility for their actions. If you are dumping that kind of coin on a card, you better be doing your homework on it know what the hell you are buying. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
it could even be a different card? couldn't a good lawyer argue that it wasn't the same card? lot of money to spend on a card that has that much work on it,and not notice it right away? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
There are a lot of dealers that have LIFETIME guarantees of authenticity on autographs and other game used equipment. What would happen if a "new" king of game used authentication was throned and (5 years after the fact) deemed that $1M Ruth bat as authentic but not the one used for the first HR in Yankee stadium? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: qualitycards.com
Did this case just end? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
The transaction happened in 1995 and the buyer sued in 1997. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Looks like there was a state law that covered the transaction...in Nebraska. What was not stated was what happened in the transaction itself: Was the deal made in person or through the mail? Was there a written agreement between the parties? Did the seller have proof of what he sold or did he simply admit that the card was the right one? Did the seller and buyer agree on a warranty? Does the law in question permit limits on warranties or as-is sales? If the deal was done in SF, why is the case in another state? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fair is fair; SGC messed up this one | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-13-2007 11:51 AM |
Fair Offer. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-23-2005 06:04 PM |
Fair Warning | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-02-2005 05:24 PM |
It seems only fair | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-29-2004 09:59 PM |
just to be fair... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2002 07:27 PM |