![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
Here's an item from the same seller as the LaJoie Bat (referenced in the other thread....) This Cotton Package Label is reported to be circa 1890, and there are quite a few others for sale concurrently by the same seller. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
I'm not offering a final opinion from eBay pics as I would require in person examination, but the closeups show what resemble period lithography. I don't identify anything errant or dubious in the eBay pics. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: 1880nonsports
Never really look here although I like memorabilia so an infrequent post. These are most likely real and spectacular labels. The problem is that one never knows how many were found - that is the suppy to address to demand. The earliest made available will sell for the highest prices until and if the equation has time to settle. The chromo on these pieces is more often than not of great artistry and color - similar to work on crate/caddie labels. I noticed the baseball one in two other semi-major auctions - which suggests the buyer(s) are putting them out there in bits - perhaps to gauge the marketplace - just as the prudent buyer does. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Theberge
I was just at an antique shop in Brimfield MA this weekend and saw a print of the first (baseball) piece listed. It was definitely a reproduction. My guess is that these are as well but I don't know for sure. I just received a very questionable 1915 beer calendar in the mail (see my other post) that I am very skeptical on. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mr. Moses
and I'm 95% convinced that these are in fact real - no reason to doubt the story or description. The admonition that it's hard to make something foolproof because fools are so inventive always applies - but there aren't always ghosts in the closet. Today's laser (and behaps even better?) printers and the like can reproduce anything. The major key to authenticity is ARE THEY CHROMOLITHOGRAPHED or some sorta photomechanical. For that you need one in hand...... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
Interesting... a rather mixed bag of responses, but no real tell-tale signs to dispute authenticity. Lots of "circumstantial" evidence, with all the other Labels listed concurrently, and the "miracle" LaJoie Bat find by the same seller. Interestingly, the LaJoie Bat has not garnered one single bid since the original NET54 post. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I looked at the enlargement of the "Home Run" litho and it looks period to me. But I never like to sign off on a scan. It would have to be seen in person. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: 1880nonsports
respected advertising auctioneer - the baseball label - and I would trust his experience relative to it's authenticity without question. It was the same pair of labels - they sold @ 900.00. Of course that says nothing about this or any other example being right - it does suggest that a "find" was made if they are legitimate - a large print run if they're not |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Theberge
I just looked at this again and noticed it was for a cotton label (Rhode Island no less) and not a print. That exact same scene was on the repro print that I saw last weekend. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: 1880nonsports
my thoughts would be that someone just made a copy of the label. In a sense - the labels are "prints". |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I agree that Ebay is a wholesale market of sorts, and perhaps my estimate of $2,500 was ambitious. But if this item was unquestionably authentic, professionally framed, and residing in a Catalogue Auction (like Mastro, Lelands, REA or Hunts), it would have realize a couple thousand $$ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Anything that's printed is a print. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: 1880nonsports
very funny ! I SWEAR I knew you would say that - it's just I was running out to Pilates.... I simply meant the classic everyday view of a "print" and what it conotes.... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
As you note, many people equate print with art print, and I understand this common conception. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Theberge
I was at the Hartford Paper show today and saw these labels for sale. Not sure if they were from the fellow who bought them but it was odd seeing them all. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Just one of each Greg? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mr. Moses
there are a bunch out there - at least that's the feeling I have based on what I'm seeing. As I "won" a couple non- baseball ones I have been doing a bit of research - and if I remember (CRS) - I'll post what I find out about them. BTW - not sure if I mentioned - the set sold in the 900,00 range. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Theberge
I saw just one of each Dan. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mr. Moses
that John K was still around! What was he selling? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Theberge
John was selling some miscellaneous sports pieces as well as an old RI beer can. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on autograph authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 17 | 12-21-2008 09:36 AM |
Question on authenticity | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 07-07-2008 10:05 AM |
Thoughts on Authenticity of 1919 WS Ticket | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-19-2006 02:50 PM |
Judging Authenticity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-10-2006 10:39 AM |
Help With Authenticity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-10-2005 09:56 AM |