![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
There are some reprinted T205s on ebay which have been treated to look like they have a little edge chipping and border wear and light stains on the back. They are very scarey looking because they are so close to the real thing... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
links or item numbers would be helpful |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Yet another example of a future fraud. Note the high feedback of "0". I hate to support the slabbers, but I really do not see myself buying a high dollar vintage card without it being in an SGC or GAI or PSA holder. At least then someone has actually looked at the card. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I don't like the odds of success when purchasing ANY big-buck high-grade card, slabbed or otherwise. Friends have questioned why I buy mid-grade cards, and that's why - though I have been very tempted recently. The recent NM-MT Tango Eggs Weaver had a BIN that really got me thinking. So what could go wrong? trimmed, corners repaired...based on what I've heard from other posters, the risk just isn't worth it to me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Albie O'Hanian
warshawlaw and runscott- It would seem to me that you have quite a bit of knowledge in vintage cards. Would you not feel comfortable buying a high-grade vintage card ungraded that you had a chance to examine yourself or from certain dealers? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
that absolutely evenly spaced edgewear is humerous; what are those three bright spots, like little suns? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I have been told that it is easy enough to identify trimmed pre-war cards, but I personally don't feel comfortable that I can spot a "good trim job". Maybe if I spent some time with an expert it would be easy to learn. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Albie O'Hanian
runscott-Thanks for answering my question. However, I was referring to ungraded cards. For example, I would trust Mark Macrae more than I would trust a grading company to give me an accurate grade for a pre-1930's card. When I wanted to buy Julie's Old Judge Galvin I would trust her opinion of the card more than a grading company. When I go to Frank Ward's site I trust his opinion of the card more than a grading company or if I see a card in a Barry Sloate auction. I admit I am different with modern (post WWII) cards but for pre-war I feel more comfortable with the dealer than anything else. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I buy mid-grade cards from almost anyone, provided I get a good scan or description and the dealer doesn't look like a fraud. But higher-grade unslabbed expensive cards are a different issue - I have a number of dealers I trust completely to be able to identify altered cards, or to give me a refund if I think the card is altered. So far, so good. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
The guys clearly states it is not real....I don't see a problem here except for ya'll not reading exactly what it says. Maybe I am missing something? Surely you guys read the sellers caveats about "looking" 100% authentic. The next paragraph says he is supposed to say it is not real and that is what he has done. Are we so prone to jumping on bandwagons that we overlook the obvious? If you read the description once you might not see it but the second time I read it I didn't have a problem. Maybe it's just me |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
Leon- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill Cornell
Guessing a seller's intentions can be iffy in some cases, but not in this one. He says in his description that the card "has been treated and appears just like a real t205 (i.e. edge chipping and color staining)." Why would anyone "treat" a reprint unless they were intending to deceive a buyer? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
The point is not that you or I can spot the fake and that the seller alludes to the fact of its being a reprint, the danger here is that one of the unscrupulous guys out there buys it and turns around and sells it for a couple hundred on ebay to someone who isn't as wary and/or knowledgeable as we are. Either that or it winds up in a PRO or AAA holder and sells for a ton. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
Albie and I got off on a tangeant - seeing this fake card stirred up some questions and we discussed them. I'm not a 'thread purist', but perhaps we should have started a new one. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I agree with you that it could end up in a fraudulent transaction down the line....as well as a lot of other cards. My only take was on this auction .....and I agree too that he should put the word "reprint" or "fake" in the title....but again, in THIS auction I still don't see the deception.....regards all |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
...but unless it's an item that their pimply-faced security squad has any interest in (like Playboys), they don't enforce it. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris Ko
What is the exact dimensions of t205s? Were there any cards for some reason or another different from the rest in terms of dimensions? I have two t205s both graded by psa that are the same measurement, however, I have a 2003 Topps T205 buyback that appears longer than the two t205 PSA graded. How is this possible. . .either both my psa's are trimmed or the buyback is longer?? here are the links |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
Chris, t205's sometimes come oversized, and my guess is thats probably what you have. Don't worry, your PSA Matty looks just fine. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
Chris, I think you need to "invest" in a copy of either the Standard Catalog of Cards or the Beckett big book. This will give you all kinds of information about virtually all cards that have been issued, and also a "guide" to prices. The SC lists t205's as 1 7/16" x 2 5/8 ", although card sizes vary. I don't think you need to be overly worried about the cards that have been graded by PSA. Although they make mistakes, for the most part they (and any other "reputable" grading service) do a reasonable job. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris Ko
Elliot: |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2752016461&category=641 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
Agreed, Lipset's book is very good and provides additional info that is not available elsewhere. Chris, you do not need both books that I mentioned---one of them will do. The 2nd book you should purchase is Lipset's. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
it's probably what they call a "jumbo," a card, probably from the upper row, when the upper border of the upper row was a bit high. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris
Thanks to all for the reading suggestions. I just picked up the Lew book from Jay off ebay. Will get the standard book as well. Thanks again. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
The new Standard Catalog should be out later this month. Jays is the publisher of VCBC and my guess is that a sample copy will be included with your book. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cards Can Be Dangerous! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-21-2008 01:57 PM |
New Dangerous Ebay Card Scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-19-2008 10:06 AM |
OT: Dangerous Sport | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-02-2007 05:18 PM |
Very dangerous phish | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-08-2006 08:01 PM |
Another dangerous scam on ebay- please read | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-27-2005 08:18 AM |