![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Not to cast any aspersions on other Old Judge collectors, but does anyone know who the moron is who is bidding over $500 on a rebacked John Smith Old Judge card. John Smith has one valuable pose, a portrait with the title "Phenominal Smith". Otherwise, his cards are common and he was certainly not a star. This is a $100 card not a $500 card. John Billingsley did a good job hypeing the card in the write-up but this bidder took the bait, and then some. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: halleygator
Thank you for at least having the decency to phrase your question in an anonymous manner ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
Jay, no one else is going to say this, so I will. John is well-trusted in the ebay community, so if his comments are believable, his customers will buy it hook-line-and-sinker. We saw this when he was selling the trimmed Lipset cards two years ago, and I was defending his descriptions, giving him the benefit of the doubt, because I know him and he's a nice guy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
On the other hand, I would not hesitate to buy from John - he is one of the friendliest sellers I have dealt with, and his customer service is A+, giving immediate refunds for undescribed writing on cards, damage, etc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John(z28jd)
The only thing i could think of besides the description possibly misleading people is that Baltimore collectors seem willing to spend alot more on old judges which ive seen on ebay in the past,but Smith also has 5 different Baltimore variations in the set so based on that alone it cant be THAT tough to warrant a $500 bid.....I think its more of a case of uneducated bidders.It looks like 2 people really want it and they were both willing to pay alot for it. I'll mention a possible similar scenario.A well-known T206 collector wanted to make sure he won a card that was probably a 35-40$ card.He bid way more than it was worth,and ended up paying $140. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
The two high bidders might have been well aware that the card isn't rare, but they each had huge egos and open bottles. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
The funny thing is the high bidder seems to be a dealer. He has over 3000 feedback and almost all of his feedbacks are sales. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Sorry--feedback was only 2500+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: halleygator
Given that it is re-backed... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
These ungraded examples from a non-professional seller sold for $3,650 on ebay. described as "1)THIS CARD PICTURES AND READS "WELSH,P.,NEW YORKS COPYRIGHT BY GOODWIN & CO. 1889 OLD JUDGE CIGARETTE FACTORY GOODWIN & CO. NEW YORK" 2)THISCARD PICTURES AND READS "DELAHANTY,2DB PHILA.,COPYRIGHT 1889 OLD JUDGE CIGARETTE FACTORY GOODWIN & CO. NEW YORK" 3)THIS CARD PICTURES AND READS "TURNER,C.F.MINNEAPOLIS COPYRIGHT 1889 OLD JUDGE CIGARETTE FACTORY GOODWIN & CO. NEW YORK" with bleary but passable pictures showing what look like vg-ex to ex cards. comments?? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
I couldn't see any obvious problems with the cards but given the sellers no return policy and the fact that the bidding level was close to full value I saw no reason to bid. Much of the bidding was done by a "1" feedback and a "0" feedback bidder so that makes you wonder a little too. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Trevor Hocking
I am amazed that this thing is even over $100 but $500 WOW!!! I think John is a very happy camper right now. I think there might be a few bidders not reading the descriptions completely. Look at what his other re-backed cards are bringing. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
But I smelled shill s**t all over that auction so I stayed out of it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I remembered that the Hebrew word for diarrhea is "shillshool". Sorta appropriate. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Trevor Hocking
I would have to agree about the shill bidding. It did look a little suspicious. I had offered the guy $3,000 to end the auction early but he passed and then amazingly I was out bid by a 0 feedbacker very shortly after the auction had opened. But there was some serious bidding after the $3,100 mark. I still believe that the cards went for a fair market price. I'm sure the auction was won by a very knowledgeable dealer, who reads this board. I'm also sure they will make a VERY nice profit off these cards, especial after they are submitted for grading. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: julie
..how would he know? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1979 Pete Rose insanity woah.......... | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 03-02-2009 04:59 PM |
Reprint Insanity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-15-2007 08:01 AM |
Insanity Reigns | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-15-2006 11:01 PM |
New levels of vintage price insanity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-10-2006 07:14 PM |
Why are they bidding so high? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 04-10-2003 08:01 PM |