![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Our old Friends are at it again
Look at this Clemente! I am bad but this is just plain Evil : |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd (nolemmings)
I confess to being fairly ignorant about spotting trimmed cards; however, I wonder to what extent is PRO grading what it knows to be trimmed cards? Look at the posted auction. Next to Roberto is a '64 Topps standup that was graded at roughly the same time as the Clemente (according to the serial numbers). As we know, Standups measure the same as Topps regular issue-21/2 x 31/2. So why is PRO slabbing the Standup in a larger framed holder than the Clemente? Why aren't the holders the same size? Would a true 21/2 by 31/2 card even fit in the Clemente holder--I think not. So isn't PRO knowingly grading cards that are short? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David
I am not an avid trading card collector and don't follow the grading card companies as closely as others on this board. Having said that, from my observation so many cards in PRO holders are SO small that either PRO is aware the cards are trimmed cards or they are incompant to the extreme. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
also known as "Kardz-r-us" "Bedrock" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
All Brians must think alike, I have always beleived these guys were a group and were slabbing there own cards in Pro holders. We could use a few stories in beckett, tuff stuff, and SCD to out these guys. They don't advertise grading services anymore anyway, maybe Adam could write a story for the next VCBC, I would be happy to help. thanks brian |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
And I will take it on. I will need actual card scans and explanations of what is wrong including measurements. I will also need data re any transactions with these dealers. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
Adam |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
Richard Koos (comic-keys) has the same morals as PRO! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
Take a look at my responses under the heading |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Richard Koos
As far as I know, I still own BOTH worthless cards that I bought from this outfit. A 1952T Mantle "Pro" 8 ('Pro-graded' being a Politically correct synonym for restored)that I'm out $12,500 on PLUS a lovely E90-1 Jackson in "Pro" 7 that I shelled out $8,900 for. That's $21,400 worth of wall-paper that I never tried foisting off or bouncing back to anyone else in the hobby. You make an off-the-cuff mindless statement about morals like some contemptuous, idiotic, jack-ass, without putting your mind in gear before engaging your fingers. Would YOU sit with $21,400 tied up in two cards that you found out were GARBAGE after you paid CASH for them, for 2 years, and NEVER once try to foist them on some unsuspecting Ebayer? Yeah, I'll just BET you would! MORALS?? Do you own a dictionary? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
Well, look who has decided to come out from under what he has been hiding under. And it took an insensitive comment on my behalf to do so. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
.... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
Below you will find the details of the PAYPAL transaction (unaltered!). My PAYPAL address IS verified IN OHIO to which the card WAS NOT sent! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
By the way, I would love to see some of those e-mails with unalterable headers! My mailing address is EXACTLY the same as my VERIFIED PAYPAL address. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Richard Koos
Tim, |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Richard Koos
Believe me, and you can verify this with Brian C.D., there aren't that many rocks in New York large enough for me to hide under. And it took an idiotic statement, not an insensitive one (do you really fathom me as being weak enough that I can be bothered by an insensitive comment?). Irony and stupidity motivated my response, not "sensitivity". |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
For the record my name is TIM and it is a name you WILL remember! And also for the record, I am NOT your son. As for the 'do not send registered', it was just a preference, but I still asked that it still be insured. That is all there is to it. What I cut and paste was not altered! Since you claim to have the receipt from the Post Office, who did sign for the package? I am curious. I am obviously making a big fuss for some reason for someone who has received the card and signed for it, huh? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Richard Koos
Rise to the occassion! You rattle very easily when presented with the correct elaboration on the half-facts you establish. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PRO Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-04-2008 04:21 PM |
PRO Grading... you've seen the 9's and 10's -- PRO .5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-07-2007 05:58 AM |
one grading company says Trimmed, another says not | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 12-22-2005 07:13 PM |
UNIQUE TYPE CARDS..Pro pizza/Bazooka/7-11/Irvindale/milk cards...etc | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-21-2005 07:27 PM |
Pro Trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-17-2004 01:59 PM |