![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been of the view that PSA 9s are underpriced relative to the 10s in the modern segment of the hobby (and maybe more generally).
Here's a PSA 9, Charles Oakley, 1986 Fleer RC. I bought it for $59. The PSA 10s cost 6-8x the amount. I challenge someone to find a PSA 10 that looks better than my 9. Last edited by bk400; 03-25-2025 at 09:00 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The $50K T206 challenge | scottglevy | T206 cards B/S/T | 6 | 04-08-2017 04:29 AM |
Not a guy to challenge.. | steve B | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 8 | 05-10-2010 05:48 PM |
Red Hindu Challenge! | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 111 | 05-02-2010 10:51 PM |
the challenge | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-01-2004 02:02 AM |
Challenge to Beckett's | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-29-2003 05:33 PM |