![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I lasted with a complete scan, that can't capture an accurate image (Rainbow foil), So I included a cell snap for a better representation of the colors,
How do you answer buyer questions about "ANY UFO spittle" or "What does the surface look like?" Would I be able to take an acceptable image depicting what issues that they may be looking for? Thanks!
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd tell them to look at the photos and condition you have it listed as. Sounds like some kind of bait and return tactic if you say it looks good, no issues etc, and then the buyer finds a miniscule thing that even a perfect photo won't pick up. They could return the card and use your message against you. Probably a fairly common tactic for psa 10 flippers, if they get it and can't say with 99% certainty it's getting a 10 and they could at best resell and break even or possibly be out grading fees and shipping. They will Instead just throw it right into the return pile and cost themselves nothing and you $10 for shipping both ways.
Maybe I'm just being a pessimist lol.
__________________
I have done deals with many of the active n54ers. Sometimes I sell cool things that you don't see every day. My Red Schoendienst collection- https://imageevent.com/lucas00/redsc...enstcollection |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sell it on COMC instead.
But yes, have them refer to your photos or block them for asking those type of questions so they can't return and neg you. A lot of sellers put something like "all cards are NM-MT or above" to show that they may have some surface flaws.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guys!
I usually accommodate requests for more info/pics as best I can, I just didn't know how to answer this. But I never even considered that my answer could be used to justify a flipper return.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Greg Morris - Trimmed Card? Proper Response? | STL1944 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 68 | 02-17-2023 03:26 PM |
Question about storing "shiny" cards like '93 Finest Refractors | vintagebaseballcardguy | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 09-07-2019 08:51 PM |
Industry participants' response to scandal so far -- report card | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 159 | 07-24-2019 10:11 AM |
What the heck!! Im baffled! | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 17 | 09-02-2016 05:19 PM |
Proper way to crack a card out of the slab? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 05-07-2010 04:24 PM |