![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Time to vent...
EDITED TO ADD: This thread erroneously started with five cards, but it should've only been four. If there are any references to a Pete Rose card, please ignore them. I had four relatively major cards with smallish stains on their glossy fronts, and decided it was a good move to break them out, remove the gum/wax deposits and send them back in to PSA through the 'Swinging Sixties' group sub way back when (the '68 Mays was actually sent in through a different sub of Bobby's). To be clear, there was no damage committed during or after the breakouts. My method for gum/wax stain removal is slow and methodical, and there were zero issues with it. So, take a look at these ridiculous results. Out of the four cards, only the 1969 Bench received the same grade it was deemed to have to begin with, and a whopping three out of four (75 frickin' percent) actually received a one point DROP in number grade!! Where in heck is the consistency?? Nothing changed except the meaningless removal of a thin, small area of gum/wax residue, yet the assessment of their grade was lowered?? Huh?? And even under the new 'no qualifiers given' approach of PSA, the centering on all four cards is fine and wouldn't merit a reduction in grade. Pathetic. SMH. Stainresultsbeforecorrect.jpg Stainresultsaftercorrect.jpg Afterthought: some people will say who cares? Even at a lower grade, they are still probably worth a little more than what you paid for them originally, but that just misses the overall point. These cards SHOULD HAVE come back with their original grades minus the 'ST.' That's the grade these cards were worthy of, said the company who graded them originally...which is the exact same company who graded them now!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 11-17-2022 at 02:05 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When is a Stain NOT a Frickin' Stain???? | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 17 | 04-20-2023 03:01 PM |
Words fail me. | frohme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-18-2017 10:02 AM |
Big Ebay Fail last night | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 10-30-2015 05:38 PM |
Cubs Fan FAIL | 4reals | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 5 | 06-11-2013 02:01 PM |
Epic fail from SGC | sdkammeyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-31-2012 11:17 AM |