![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a small pile of ones that were rejected by 1 TPA that I think may be good. Opinions would be greatly appreciated
picture 1 Was unsure of Drysdale as the height of the D's made me nervous. I like the Klem but PSA did not fake1.jpg The Foxx was part of a collection of signed batter up I got from a Mastro Auction many years ago. All the others were spot on. The J in Jimmy to me is a total match to a recent one from the Uncle Jimmie Collection. Only thing off to me is the F which doesn't match anything else I've ever seen but the fact the others were perfect and in same pen I think it must have been an early IP autograph with a variation on the F. What does everyone else think? Hodges was a recent purchase from ABC unlimited. failed JSA. I know in the past PSA rejected one of my Hodges that looks like this while Beckett will OK anything in the ballpark. Opinions fake 2.jpg I like this one in some ways but the Harridge looks slow and iffy. This was submitted to JSA and PSA. One said Harridge was good and Giles bad and the other TPA said the opposite I usually put fakes in the circular file as I hate having them around, would never sell them etc but I haven't been able to pull the plug on these. If some folks like any of these I might sell or resubmit them. The only reason I use TPA is at my age and health I am not sure how long I'll be around and making it easier for those that inherit. Thanks for all opinions and for all the help you all constantly are fake3.jpg |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Certainly not an expert. But if you were going to forge a Harridge/Giles set of autographs, wouldn't you make them more visually pleasing?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My opinion FWIW...
Drysdale and Foxx could be OK, but I can see why a TPA might not like them. Harridge looks terrible, Hodges looks like a slowly drawn version, so not good. Klem- K looks wrong and haven't seen 3 dots under the name- always 2 or none, too many top peaks in the m. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Klem is terrible and appears to have been written yesterday with a new pen. Not sure what to think on Foxx because he had so many different style changes. It doesn’t match anything, but who knows. Hodges is terrible. He never had any hesitations like that. Giles looks good to me, but Harridge looks bad too.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What do you do if you suspect eBay shilling | Marchillo | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-12-2017 08:19 AM |
Another Suspect T201 on the Bay | Bocabirdman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-19-2014 02:16 PM |
I suspect Dizzy Dean is... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-12-2006 02:53 PM |
Way too much.....suspect? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-12-2005 11:44 PM |
Ummm... think this Mantle is suspect? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-10-2005 04:39 PM |