 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-02-2021, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1964 topps question
I have a couple of cards that otherwise would be “grade worthy” except the scratch off on the back has been exposed. One clearly looks like it was intentionally removed back in the day, the other seems to have exposed just due to time...very faint
I think I once read that cards like this would always max out as “2”s due to “back damage”, regardless of the rest of the card. Seems harsh, but just curious if that is close to accurate. Just don’t want to waste limited grading bullets should I go that route Appreciate any experiential advice 
|
|
#2
07-02-2021, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry.. out this in the wrong section. Apologies...rookie mistake
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Sale:1964 Topps Al Kaline PSA 9 1964 Juan Marichal PSA 9 1965 Ernie Banks PSA 8.5 | jfkheat | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 01-06-2019 05:30 PM |
| 1964? Auravision Baseball 33 1/3 RPM Records Question | clamendo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 01-02-2013 03:31 PM |
| Question regarding 1964 Topps #103 Curt Flood | NewEnglandBaseBallist | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 11-20-2012 09:16 PM |
| 1964 Topps Photo Tatoo question | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 25 | 09-28-2012 04:36 AM |
| Question on 1964 Topps... | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 03-14-2008 05:18 AM |
Linear Mode
