![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi All,
I just picked up a few potential upgrades to my 1956 Topps set and I am having trouble deciding between the new ones and my old ones in terms of eye appeal. I have put quality scans in below and I would love to hear opinions from folks on this board regarding the relative eye appeal. Thanks! 1. Harmon Killebrew Old ![]() ![]() New ![]() ![]() 2. Mathews Old ![]() ![]() New ![]() ![]() 3. Snider Old ![]() ![]() New ![]() ![]() Thanks in advance and let me know what you think! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those are all super nice and really tough to tell but I like the new Killebrew and Mathews better and the old Snider better.
__________________
Collecting: Sandy Koufax "Left Arm of God"
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That’s my current thinking as well! Thanks for the quick input. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The old Killebrew has a slight diamond cut, but I like the skin tones on that one and the old Duke over the newer ones. Jump ball on the Matthews.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice 56s. Such a great set.
I’d say old Killebrew, new for the other two. Good luck deciding.
__________________
Main Collection: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=858 Diamond Stars HOFers: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=862 The Amazin' Mets: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=863 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
New, new, old. But whatever you decide, if you want to sell your doubles let me know, I'm collecting 56 too.
Thanks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like all the new ones better. Killebrew is a close call because the corners look sharper on the old one. I definitely prefer the new Snider; Duke's face is a little blurry on the old one.
All nice cards either way. How many of your 56s are graded? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1. Old
2. New 3. New All of the cards are quite nice. ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Id say the new and old, probably
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
New,new ,old
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Old, new, new from me.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tough call since all the cards look great but I am going with old, new and new.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Handwriting opinions requested | doug.goodman | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 19 | 01-12-2017 05:23 PM |
Expert Opinions Requested: | clydepepper | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 06-05-2015 08:56 PM |
Opinions on Card Value Requested: | clydepepper | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-12-2014 09:11 AM |
Opinions Requested | ezez420 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 24 | 06-05-2014 07:45 PM |
Opinions Requested: Which Card Would You Keep? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 07-15-2007 10:05 AM |