![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey all, I'm selling a 1910 e98 Cy Young 6.5BvG on the BST page. Looking for input on whether it would be a better selling point to crossover to PSA for a possible .5 higher grade or keep it with BvG? It's a Pop of 1 highest graded on BvG website and also one of the "hit" cards from Gems of the Game mystery box. Neat card for sure, just hard to price it the way it sits. Thanks!
![]() Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great card, but I think it best in its current holder. I think the centering will keep PSA from grading it any higher than where it stands right now. Save the money and time on an attempted PSA crossover, and keep it exactly as you have it now, and you'll be OK. Good luck!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crack it out!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can only cite my own experience, but I've submitted a couple of dozen cards to PSA for crossover and never gotten a higher grade.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just a total guess but if PSA gave it a 5.5, from my experiences, I would take the PSA card due to value. PSA markets their product far better than BVG, imo....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BVG to SGC crossover | dio | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 09-28-2016 02:11 PM |
T201...To crossover or not crossover | drmondobueno | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-19-2012 10:14 AM |
Sgc crossover | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-27-2008 07:39 AM |
GAI CrossOver ---> SGC = ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 04-28-2007 09:39 AM |
Crossover value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-04-2004 08:49 AM |