![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have pondered this lately and looked at some old threads. Are the reasons for the pricing/value disparities between the two types of issues such as the size of the cards and perhaps how they were distributed?? I understand it more with premium issues. It really jumps out at me when looking at Ruth items, for example. Even lower grade '33 Goudey Ruths across most of his four cards from that set command somewhere around $3,000 at least. The Kashin is much, much less. I have really come to appreciate the photography of issues like the Kashins and see real value there. I am in NO WAY diminishing the massive following of sets like '33 Goudey. Generations of collectors can't be wrong. I just wonder if I am missing something about the lack of following/value of b&w/sepia issues like the Kashins? Thanks guys.
Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 05-20-2020 at 11:44 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 & 1934 Goudey Lot (Updated With Individual Pricing) | ronniehatesjazz | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 10-08-2017 11:43 AM |
PSA 9 vs. SGC 96 Huge Price Disparity | Delray Vintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 11-08-2015 11:14 PM |
What's with Fan Craze Gem Mint disparity, AL vs. NL? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-08-2014 01:31 PM |
1940 playball,kashin,1936 goudey f/s or trade | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-08-2008 10:46 AM |
Wow. The incredible disparity of SCD | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 04-28-2002 11:54 PM |