![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This has to be the strangest thing printed on the back of a baseball card that I've ever come across.
I was examining the back of a 1996 Topps Stadium Club, Extreme Players insert card. The back of the card explains the rules for a contest and how to mail-in for the Extreme Winners cards. However, what I found about midway down the card has me scratching my head. Can anyone shed any light on this (other than it was someone's idea of a practical joke)?
__________________
. - Charles Check out my collection.......... http://ImageEvent.com/The_Cardfather Check out my stuff for sale......... (Message me for Net54 members direct sale discount.) https://www.ebay.com/str/thecardfathersstore |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's due to Canada's lottery/gambling rules, and their contention that baseball cards being won or pack inserted randomly could be considered a type of lottery. So instead of being fully random (game of chance), they require this type of question to be answered to move the contest into a game of skill for legal reasons.
Do some Google searches. You're not the first one to ask.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dupe
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 07-16-2019 at 07:34 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Same reason a lot of contests here have a "no purchase necessary to win" in small print
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But there's no correct answer.
The beginning is easy: 96/6 = 16 But then the equation reads 16 + 64 x 3 = Which could be either: (16+64) x 3 which would equal 210 OR 16 + (64x3) which would equal 208 So how can it be a game of skill ... if they set it up that there is no "correct" answer?
__________________
__________________ Looking for 1923 W572 Walt Barbare and Pat Duncan. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is a correct answer. Mathematical formulas have an implicit order even without parentheses. You may remember learning "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally" as a kid.
https://www.mnemonic-device.com/arit...-aunt-sally-2/ Using this order of equations, there is a single right answer. These types of questions also pop up on my Facebook feed too often, under the heading of "84% of Americans Can't Solve This!".
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
208
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Has anybody ever tried to win anything without purchasing? (no purchase necessary to win)
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My friend got back a letter once that said 'your submission was picked and no purchase necessary but you did the math wrong so we had to give the prize to someone else'
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 07-15-2019 at 08:49 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hopefully the average Canadian retains more of the knowledge from elementary school math class than the average American.
But yes 208 is the correct answer. And 240 would be the answer without the order of operations. Not 210.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I saw a post on the Blowout boards a couple of months ago where the No Purchase Necessary winner got a couple of Marvel autographed cards for free, totalled around $500.
Upper Deck also comped some people gold coins in their NPN sweepstakes when they released the 2017 Grandeur Coins Hockey release. 1/66 seems like a really good odds for just sending in postcards. Quote:
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 07-15-2019 at 04:00 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's right; I had this issue pop up at work recently with a client who wanted to run a contest. if you require a purchase it becomes an illegal lottery.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 07-20-2019 at 11:41 PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That’s hilarious.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I bought a lot of Topps Now and have no idea what I have | Tennis13 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 01-14-2017 01:17 PM |
Joke of the Day | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-26-2010 11:45 AM |
1905 Paper Back - Practical Hints on Base Ball Practice - Jay M. Fisher | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 02-13-2009 12:29 PM |
Joke of the day | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-04-2008 08:29 AM |
What a joke................ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 08-24-2007 08:28 PM |