![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got a '57 Topps #1 card with a Ted Williams autograph authenticated by GAI (done in 2005). What's the opinion out there to get this card re-authenticated by SGC? Is it worth the cost?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends on the year for GAI. Early on they were good. I've purchased many for pennies on the dollar and gotten certified by the big 3
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would get it out of that GAI holder. I think having the GAI name attached is not going to help you.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suggest sharing a photo of the autograph here for opinions before submitting anywhere else.
As others have stated, GAI was credible at one time, but in later years had a terrible reputation. Due to their mass authentication of questionable items in later years, it marred the name and everything in a GAI/GA holder is seen as suspect by many in the community.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
GAI was good early on, problematic (to use a euphemism) later on. I'm not sure at what point 2005 would be. It might be in the later good period. I believe Gutierrez went from GAI to PSA in 2005.
GAI is a textbook case in how to ruin a brand name. They even ruined it retroactively backwards to when they were credible. Duly note that GAI LOAs (not graded cards) when Gutierrez was there will have his name. Last edited by drcy; 02-12-2019 at 09:52 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will post a pic tomorrow of the auto'd card
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a pic of the card
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
here's the backside
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|