![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A great aspect of the hobby are collector's varying attractions to a card's make-up. For me it's (in order of importance)
1. Centering 2. Registration (clarity of image, lack of print defect) 3. Corners 4. Stains 5. Paper integrity (chipping, rough edges) Would be curious to hear opinions of others here and Add a card that typifies your choices! Here's mine:
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 08-12-2017 at 04:48 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey AJ. Good topic. Mine would be:
Centering Corners Registration Staining Paper Loss (back) Centering use to be down the list but in the last 5 years, it has went to the top. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My list would look just like yours AJ. centering is A1 for me.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mine would be - do I have it or not?
If I don't already have it - who the hell cares what it looks like? I think all of the people who worry about the condition are certifiably insane. You show me a PSA 10 and I'll show you a card that has been doctored. You show me a PSA 1 and I'll show you a card that has lived a good life and that was well loved. Fortunately for me, the majority of card collectors care more about shallow appearances than actual substance. Of course living in LA - on a daily basis I see that this last statement applies to a whole lot more people than just card collectors! ;-)
__________________
__________________ Looking for 1923 W572 Walt Barbare and Pat Duncan. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the card doesn't have sharp corners I'm not really interested.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My approach is: is this a problem the card had when it came out of the pack? If so, I don't care so much. So gum stains, centering, print marks, etc., not usually a big deal. Creases, stains, writing, rips, etc., more of a problem.
__________________
My website: https://edwardwclayton.wixsite.com/my-site |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And since everyone loves pics... ![]()
__________________
Current Wantlist: E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1 E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm sure there is a huge difference in the level of concern with regards to centering and corners based on whether you focus on pre-war or post-war cards. Since I collect the latter (and they are 'easier' to find), I look for sharp corners first, while centering (as well as other things) is less important. If I collected the older stuff, I'm sure the sharpness of the corners would drop down on my requirements list, simply because it would be much harder to find the cards I want, so I couldn't afford to be too picky.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like a lot of us think the same way.
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Sam - Spectacular cards. Love em!! Here's one I stare at almost everyday. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damn I've been looking for a Bat On Cobb just like this one! Dean great looking card!
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AJ,
First of all, that is a tremendous PSA 4 Mantle Buddy. Here is the way that I prefer my cards when collecting them. 1- Corners 2- Centering 3- No Paper Loss 4- Eye Appeal 5- Edges |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I always try to look for cards that are centered, have great eye appeal, and a sharp clean image. I can live with slightly rounded corners since I generally buy low grade anyways. I don't mind minor paper loss on the back if the front has all those attributes. I certainly didn't mind it on the T206 Cobb ![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jerry, those are two nice cards.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
must haves paying huge sums | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-11-2014 08:37 AM |
As baseball-card sales drop, North Jersey card sellers look to the stars - See more a | mcap100176 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-24-2014 11:03 AM |
Introduction and a question on which cards are "Must Haves" | Clark7781 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 02-16-2010 06:33 PM |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |