 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-21-2017, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
General Questions on Authenticity
Does it seem as though it is more of a challenge to discern authenticity in modern guys? It seems as though prior to autographs becoming an "industry" players took care in signing their names which presumably made it more of a challenge to forge - signatures looked like a work of art. I am a Tigers guy, and I have physically seen guys like Verlander signed autographs at the ballpark that are illegible aside from "JV 35" and look like a 5 year old had written it. I am not sure there is a question here, just looking for some broad thoughts.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Introduction+general questions | awz50 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 06-23-2016 03:12 PM |
| General questions on M-101-2 issue | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-16-2014 03:48 PM |
| Answering specific autograph authenticity questions and help | kengoldin | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 30 | 02-03-2013 04:05 PM |
| Grading questions in general and for 1967 Topps | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 06-02-2011 12:45 PM |
| N173 general questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-29-2007 07:11 PM |
Threaded Mode