![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi All,
I just got my first batch of cards back from PSA and I have a question that you all might be able to help me with. One of the cards came back with a MK qualifier on it. In looking at the card through a loupe, the only thing I can see is what appears to be a faint blue printing line at the lower right edge of the front of the card (see below). Is this common? I thought MK was for ink marks as in someone writing on the card with a pen. Do I crack it out and get it regarded? Here is a picture of the card: (note: What looks to be an "H" next to "Billy" on the back of the card is an artifact of my scanner)
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scan isn't really good enough to tell. Probably crack and re-grade.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do not crack out and re-grade. That is bad advice. Whether the blue mark is a man-made mark or a printer mark, either way you're going to get a qualifier. It's either gonna be MK or PD (Print Defect). Does it really matter which one?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can barely see it; at grades 6 and below, some print defects are possible without getting a PD qualifier. So a 4 with slight PD wouldn't warrant a PD qualifier either.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim, one way to get a mysterious MK qualifier is if the card originally had a pencil mark and it was later erased. Maybe check the reverse to see if any evidence of an erasure exists? Just a possibility...
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
(ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
Should PSA/SGC have a qualifier for Centering? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-22-2011 09:57 AM |
How is T206 not an MC Qualifier? | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-10-2010 11:28 AM |