![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: sean
Id like to say I have literally no interest in post 1970 baseball but I cant help but love the 1988 starting lineups. They are super cool and super cheap! Granted most dont look like the player but their are a few exceptions (The Pete Rose is perfect!). They are pretty worthless right now but I honestly believe they are a good investment cause every cool baseball item sooner or later (in this case MUCH later) becomes valuable. Wouldnt it be great to have starting lineups for every year! I personally a Hughie Jennings doing his famous eeyah! OR Frank Chance getting beaned, or do a starting lineup playset of fred merkle NOT running to second |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amazing Story- Crooks didnt take Pre-War material?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-19-2008 11:05 AM |
E100 Bishop and Company...why didnt more people bid? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-11-2007 12:29 PM |
This team featured one of the most feared 19th century lineups ever | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-11-2005 12:07 AM |
ones that didnt get away | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-28-2005 07:07 AM |
PRO - nothing we didnt already know, but interesting article... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-31-2004 10:22 PM |