![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Coming from prewar now into postwar cards I was wondering how the 2 compare?I know this has been beaten to death on the other forum...probably here too...sorry.
Scott Last edited by goudey1933; 02-01-2016 at 06:46 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA is preferred for both until you show me ebay ads that say PSA 'Not SGC'
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL, Yes PSA is preferred by those that like to pay more for the same exact card/grade. It is baffling to me but hey it is their $.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you give more specific info I am sure you will get some very good answers and not troll like posts like Jake's and my troll like response to him. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA is the king of postwar. With that being said, SGC is next (better than BVG) and has the best looking holders.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From what I have noticed a higher end SGC card will sell for somewhere around half way between the equivalent PSA grade and one below. Aside from cards like the 52 Mantle yesterday that transcend their grade.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speak for yourself. Some of us prefer our cards accurately graded.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
right we all want that....
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Most of my cards are PSA graded, but I am worried about what will happen to the value of the couple in SGC holders. Although perhaps this will just blow over in the minds of those collectors who aren't active on these forums.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are you buying as a hobby or are you buying for investment?
If for hobby I would buy what ever one you think the cards look nicer in. If for investment it is more of a card by card decision. Always buy the card and not the holder because eye appeal means a lot. You can always crack it out and get it into what ever magic plastic holder is selling for the most when you decide to sell. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The trend seems to be that PSA has a higher resale value, but in terms of accuracy of grading I have seen both of those companies make mistakes all over the place in the past. Each unto his own, I would say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Postwar RC's | Robextend | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-03-2015 07:49 AM |
WTT: Postwar for T206's | jasonc | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 09-12-2014 03:17 AM |
FS Postwar PCL Regionals | t213 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-06-2013 09:33 AM |
What are your top 10 postwar cards? | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 53 | 12-29-2011 03:17 AM |
SGC and Postwar Cards | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 11-24-2010 08:58 AM |