![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Myers. I mean the most it could get would be an "authentic" grade and I know it is authentic. Cut out of an old scrapbook with the scrapbook page still pasted on the back where I cut it out and the bottom was trimmed off years ago before it was pasted in.
Should I even bother or just keep it as it is in the screwdown I put it in? ![]()
__________________
Bill Potter T206 Beater Collection currently at 51/524 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you have other N172s in holders and prefer consistency, get it graded. If you have other raw N172s either in penny sleeves or top loaders or binder pages, throw it in with those.
Looks like you are also collecting a beater T206 set. Would you rather add a couple more cards to your collection or use the $15+ (s/h both ways + grading fee) to have a trimmed Myers in an authentic holder? Your call ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Bill Potter T206 Beater Collection currently at 51/524 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No reason to holder that one.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for starting the n172 threads...always fun to talk about this set and hear what others think... I leave all my cards the way I find them, in other words, I don't crack slabs, but I don't send cards off for grading. Here's one of the better condition OJ's that I have...it's in an SGC 40 Holder...
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't really collect OJs, but agree that there's no real reason to send that one in. If you got any more when re-selling it would probably just cover what you paid to grade it if you're lucky. And it doesn't sound like you're planning to sell it any time soon.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does anybody's experience with OJ's find them to be outside of the stated size of 1 7/16" x 2 1/2" or is that size pretty consistent most the time unless trimmed?
I know I have a raw card that is a bit thinner than 1 7/16" but is longer than 2 1/2". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it depends if you would like to re-sell it in the future or not. If it is for your own collection leave it. if down the road you want to move it..in my experience you will get more $ if it is in a PSA holder. As far as what kind of holder to keep it in goes...I like to keep my collection in all of the same type of holders as it makes them easier to store, hold, play with, etc....Any way you go you win because the Old Judge cards are great to have.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this card worth grading? | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 05-28-2014 07:45 PM |
Is this card really worth that???? | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 100 | 03-29-2010 12:06 AM |
T100...does PSA or SGC grade these? Worth getting graded? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 04-05-2007 04:41 PM |
T230 AND T221...worth getting graded under the January tobacco card spcl??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-02-2007 09:08 PM |
1887 N172 Old Judge Wallace Fessenden Umpire Card SGC Graded SOLD! | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-27-2005 06:50 PM |