![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't care how nice the card looks overall...if you have significant paper loss, then the grade is POOR 1. This is awful, just awful. If they had given it a FAIR 1.5 based on the front eye appeal of the card, then I wouldn't argue the point, but a GOOD 2??? Come on!
Maybe my grading standards are too harsh...What do other Net54 members think? ![]() ![]()
__________________
CASSIDYS SPORTSCARDS - Vintage Baseball Cards 1909 - 1976 https://www.ebluejay.com/store/CASSIDYS_SPORTSCARDS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did SGC miss the paper loss? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-20-2012 11:28 PM |
PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM |
Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |