![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's your take on how the hobby has evolved over the years with respect to condition?
Seems to me a high end collector "sub-set" has emerged paying obscene prices for high-grade cards -- say, PSA 8-10 -- based on their condition scarcity, even though those cards often have only minute differences in actual condition (e.g., need a loupe, black light, etc.) When I was growing up, raw vintage cards that were in Ex-Mt condition at the card shop seemed rare and "high-end". But today, a PSA 6 is considered "Mid-grade". Feels like this is creating a two-tier market: high-end where prices are skyrocketing like precious metals; and "all other", where prices are actually fairly stable over 20, 30 years. (check out Mike Payne's Top 300 baseball cards book from 1999, the prices listed seem similar to today's prices for anything from Good to Ex-Mt after adjusting for condition. But a PSA 8 or PSA 9 suddenly goes for 3-10x what the 1999 "high-range" price listed in the book) Anyway - is this focus on grading and particularly the high-end focus good or bad for the hobby? Why? The answer is probably "It's good in some ways, bad in others" - but would love to hear other collectors' take. Last edited by MCoxon; 08-07-2015 at 07:25 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it depends on why one collects cards.... hobby only, investment only, or combination hobby and investment. Also depends on whether you are just a collector, just a seller, or do both. If you sell and invest , in whole or part, grading is hard to ignore or avoid
Also, if you get caught up in the Registry rankings, you are hooked Last edited by ALR-bishop; 08-07-2015 at 07:55 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There are a fairly large number of people with deep pockets driving the high end market up for a variety of reasons, ego, investments, or whatever. But the low and mid range condition stuff, which is much more plentiful, doesn't seem to change a whole lot. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
low POP cards in the best condition that are sought after in the top tier rankings are the new 'star' cards ......big stars but short of HOFs or almost HOFs in vintage with high POP really don't sell as well as low POP PSA 8s of unknown guys for 1950s cards for example.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 08-07-2015 at 09:27 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It made it much simpler to purchase cards when you knew what you were getting. There was Tipton mint, and Larry Fritch mint, and on and on it went. I hated the descriptions in some of the old Fritch catalogs - NM, except for punch hole in top, or VG/EX - except for writing and slight crease. What did that mean?????? So PSA and others devised a scale with standards and you knew what a 1, 2,3.... etc were. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Personally I don't understand the registry thing, but every now and then I do have an urge to pick up a high grade card, then I see the price tag, and the urge goes away... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But what if you become one of the walking dead Mark ? What then ?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oh, and Al I'll have to will you my "bestest" item so you can post it along w/the '67 Topps full color test sheet and you'll be an envy to someone else besides me... |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I look at it 2 groups. The registry guys and other like me that just collect what they like.
The registry thing has/had a huge impact i think, people want to be #1 and thus prices surge in order to acheive their goal or agenda to acheive that. These are the guys that basically buy the grade, not the card. Unitl SGC or Beckett develop something like what PSA, its PSA to lose. If and when the others do, it may be another boom in the market, the TPG then also could see more demand in crossovers perhap as well. If someone has a stonghold on the #1 spot on PSA, they essentially could move to SGC and be #1 there. In which case, it opens an argument which is better? #1 on PSA or #1 on SGC. The other groups: I collect what i like. Either it been Mickey Mantle or what i collect now, which is post-war Hof'ers. (i also got 2 t206 Cobbs) I think i collected these card, becasue of these were the names to collect when i and you grew up. Names like Gehrig, Dimaggio, Mantle, Mays, Aaron, Banks, Paige. The veterans on this more, more tend to older guys like Ruth, Cobb, Wagner. But to tell ya, over the year i am growing to love these pre-war cars as well. This is perhaps a reason some fav's like Ruth are driving prices up. He is iconic still this day.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading discussion- Revolutionizing :) the hobby... | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 11-19-2010 02:17 PM |
When a hobby turns into a sick obsession | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 04-18-2006 12:30 PM |
who are your obsession players | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 47 | 12-26-2004 01:14 PM |
Grading/condition question??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-15-2004 12:39 PM |
trimming obsession | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-04-2003 10:19 PM |