![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For my further research of the 1962 Topps green tint cards, I could really use pics of uncut sheets from that part of the set. Does anyone know where I can find such a thing, as I have never seen one or been able to locate one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Darren, based on the number of cards in the GT series, should there not be two unique sheets with each card appearing 3 times (excluding checklists) over the two sheets as there are no known SPs in this series?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Saved, that's what I'm trying to find out. There are a few cards that are extremely tougher to find readily available than the preponderance of the series, so I'd like to see if there's a verifiable reason for it. Perhaps some cards were, in fact, SP's. It's frustrating not being able to locate pics of uncut sheets.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Which card #s are you seeing that are harder than others in the GT series?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would think any SP oddities in an 88 card series would be due to the position of certain cards along edges or corners.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's some insight into what I'm thinking. The green tints run from #110 to 196, which means a total of 87 cards (if we assume the misnumbered card #139 of Hal Reniff fills the spot of card #159). This total includes the #192 checklist card. I don't know the official methods of Topps sheet printing, but I do know they usually included the checklist for the next series in the print runs (a marketing ploy to get us kids to continue buying cards to get these 'phantom' cards which weren't actually available until later). So, if that additional checklist is added, then we come to a total of 88 cards. This is an aspect of green tints that I have never seen mentioned before in discussions of the phenomena--this extra checklist that isn't a part of the 110-196 schematic.
All the green tint cards are cropped differently (in most cases, just slightly) and show a distinct muddy, blurry appearance with the color balance being way off. The cards are really murky. However, checklist #192 doesn't show any of these characteristics and checklist #277 (which I assume would be the additional checklist I talked about above) doesn't either. Perhaps this is due to the lack of a photograph being featured on the front? Checklist #192 does have an anomaly between the two versions, being found either with or without a comma after "Check List" in the bottom left, which means they were surely the result of two different layouts, but checklist #277 has only the slightest differences between the two versions. Some call it darker vs. lighter wood grain, but the clear telling point is the check boxes being much lower with regard to the numbers beside them. But this is pretty minor overall, and if you transpose the names of the players from the two versions of this card, they match up perfectly. It seems odd that all the players' cards would be re-laid out by the 'new' printer, but the checklists would remain virtually unchanged. It's frickin' really late and I've taken an ambien (I know, TMI), so I hope I'm explaining this all correctly, but part of my goal in finding some pics of uncut sheets would be to see what was going on with the checklists and to determine if they were in fact printed along with the other cards. Based on their distinct lack of murkiness, it's possible they weren't included on those sheets…but the chance of that is probably remote. If anyone has some good insight into the Topps printing process, please chime in and edify us.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2013 Topps Heritage UNCUT SHEET of 100 Refractors!! | cparker94 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 09-06-2014 06:37 PM |
FS: 1983 Topps Baseball Uncut Sheet SOLD | quinnsryche | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-20-2014 12:10 PM |
Selling 1972 1-263 Topps FB Set 1962 Uncut Post Sheet | Blwilson2 | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 05-26-2014 09:23 AM |
F/S 1975 Topps Uncut Sheet SOLD!! | pow323 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-14-2011 05:32 PM |
OT: 1954 Topps uncut sheet | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 07-29-2010 11:29 PM |