![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Overall, pleased with the results and service, a few cards done for resale purposes, but most to keep. Struck out with 71s as I was going for high grade 8.5 or higher
57 Williams. Bought this raw, overpaid, did not see scratch marks on surface when I bought it, just wanted a 5 and I got it. Still like the card: ![]() Bought a raw set for $450 and this Brett card made it worth my investment, also got many nice cards to upgrade my set: ![]() Nothing too special about the Rice but I liked the centering and was happy with a 7.5, bought it raw probably in the 20-ish range. ![]() Picked this up at a LCS a couple years ago for under $5, now a $175-ish card. Very pleased with the result. ![]() Not a big fan of modern cards but living in Pittsburgh I have to have a Crosby and Malkin RC, and have a PSA 10 Young Guns Crosby, was nice to add a Malkin PSA 10 too even though I was not expecting this grade. ![]() Last one I'll show is a '75 Morgan that also came with that set and I thought the card was as perfect as you can get, sold it to a collector yesterday. Felt good that my instincts were right and indeed it graded very high. ![]() Last edited by mintacular; 08-18-2014 at 11:12 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That Ted Williams is AMAZING. If you're ever selling that one, holla at your boy. Great eye all around!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great cards! Beautiful centering on each!
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 180/180 (100%) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted Williams is a beauty.......looks MUCH better than a '5'.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice group of graded cards. That Williams has outstanding eye-appeal for a 5. It beats a lot of higher graded cards. Thanks for sharing.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat, is that the same Larussa I was trying to get you to sell to me so long ago??
![]() ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, Shawn glad I didn't sell it to you, just sold it for $170 dlvd. Do you remember what I offered to sell it to you for? Thank you all for the Williams comments, there are 3 scratches on it that I didn't see when I bought it. Feel good though that others see the eye appeal that I saw.
Last edited by mintacular; 08-19-2014 at 11:33 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think we ever actually established a price because if I remember you were not sure if you were going to sell it. I just wanted it!
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm really diggin' that Williams - great centering and '57 Topps is such a classic set. I can handle almost any blemish on my cards as long as the centering is nice.
Congrats! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Most Recent 300-Card Submission--14 Upgrades | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 77 | 02-17-2009 09:35 PM |
Sellers without back scans...affect your bid? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-27-2008 08:44 AM |
what do you think these will grade: added back scans | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-02-2006 04:43 AM |
T205/T207 Back Scans | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-12-2005 02:52 PM |
Need scans-m101-5 with TSN back and E121 with | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-10-2003 04:41 PM |