| 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			...
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Last edited by Rollingstone206; 02-25-2015 at 04:04 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Card appears diamond cut to me, which I would think would prevent the assigned grade.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Agreed. The top right and bottom left corners fit snugly in the case, while the top left and bottom right fall short.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
			All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel: 
			Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 08-16-2014 at 05:23 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I agree with Brian.  It looks hacked, not factory diamond-cut.  The top right looks like it slopes up to the point also.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	ThatT206Life.com  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Just one man's opinion, but I find the shape and cut of that 8 to be quite unappealing. Perhaps that does occur naturally, if it is not trimmed. I can say for a fact that there are examples of this card which fill the holder completely, and are square. I would take a lower grade example that is full-sized and square for a couple grand over that 8 all day, but that's just me. One can spend less money, get a more attractive card, and have peace of mind it isn't trimmed.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Last edited by MattyC; 08-16-2014 at 05:58 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			A "real" one (I think) for contrast.
		 
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Exactly; and that fullness is no fluke. Here is another that fills the holder much more than the 8 above or the other 8 below.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			 
		Last edited by MattyC; 08-17-2014 at 12:55 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			...
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Last edited by Rollingstone206; 10-11-2014 at 06:22 PM.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| FS: 33 Goudey Ruth and 34 Goudey Gehrig in poor condition | sylbry | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-22-2014 12:56 PM | 
| WTT-1934 Goudey Gehrig BVG 1.5+ cash for your Ruth Goudey 144 or Sports King | frankh8147 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-08-2013 12:35 PM | 
| FS: 1928 Harrington's Babe Ruth and 1933 Goudey Ruth #149 | piecesofthegame | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2013 06:50 AM | 
| 1933 Goudey #53 Babe Ruth vs 1934 "Canadian Goudey" WWG #28 Babe Ruth | Yaz#8 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-21-2012 09:31 AM | 
| SALE: 1933 Goudey Ruth SGC 10 & 1932 Sanella Ruth PSA 6 | iggyman | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2011 06:11 PM |