 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-06-2013, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Question about a t206 Doyle Natl
I submitted my 1910 Piedmont 350 subjects Joe Doyle Natl to sgc to be graded. Sgc sent the card back and said it was altered due to excessive paper loss?? The card/ tag they sent back said it was not trimmed, wasn't altered, wasn't counterfit, so why not slab it? I figured Id ask some of you more seasoned collectors for your opinions? I'm not sure how to upload pics but I can send them via email if someone wanted to see them. When I spoke to sgc they said the card was authentic but evidence of alteration due to paper loss.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I have a Question about a Larry Doyle T206 back | Drew6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-27-2010 07:19 PM |
| T206 Joe Doyle Question (or "The Uncommon Common") | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-20-2007 12:37 PM |
| T206 Doyle Nat'l Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-18-2007 04:49 PM |
| Mastro -Doyle Natl. ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 09-04-2003 01:44 PM |
| T206 Question ... DOYLE, N. Y. (Hands above head) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-16-2003 11:45 AM |
Threaded Mode