![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is there a difference in #92 and #160?
I was looking at my 1933 #92 Gehrig and it struck me: "How did PSA know this card is #92 ?" There is paper loss over the number. I've tried to find the difference in the two cards before (other than the number) and can't find any. Does anyone have any insight on this? The #92 card is mine, the #160 card I borrowed from any ebay listing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: '33 Goudey Ruth (yellow), both Gehrigs | Runscott | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-21-2012 12:31 PM |
33 Goudey set - Ruths, Gehrigs, etc. | Runscott | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 05-03-2012 03:32 PM |
1933-34 Goudey Gehrigs and Ruths F/S | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 01-26-2009 09:57 AM |
Super rare Tcards & 2 Goudey Gehrigs for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 12-27-2006 07:39 PM |
Looking For 34 Goudey Gehrigs | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 10-14-2005 08:14 AM |