![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am curious as to how we would grade the grading companies here. 10 being perfect and 1 being the worst. Of course the "a" for they are there but don't really count. Please feel free to elaborate or add others.
Here are my grades: PSA 7 SGC 8.5 BGS 5 GAI 4
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA N-4 Questionable Authenticity
SGC 9 BGS 5 GAI 1 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I first started collecting graded cards, Beckett was the choice, but as I got more experienced, I noticed most people were all about PSA and SGC when it came to pre-war. Although I came to like PSA, they are starting to majorly disappoint recently. A lot of cards with paper loss (and I mean massive loss) that are being graded B=VG to VG-EX...pathetic. So here are my opinions.
SGC=9 BGS/BVG=7 PSA=6 Because these are primarily the only grading companies I deal with, I will not grade the others...Beckett should get some props!
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA 2
SGC 3 BGS 0 GAI 0 At first I had Beckett a 1. But then I remembered that if they're doing all of their publishing and selling then they shouldn't be grading. I think they have a conflict of interest there, so I docked them 1 point for that... down to GAI's low level. Last edited by FrankWakefield; 09-15-2011 at 04:04 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc-92
psa -6 bgs/bvg-6 gai - 2 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
thats a tough one because i feel all the major grading companies are a little more (keener) in certain areas than the others. for example i wouldnt have Sgc grade a 1989 ud griffey jr. rc or BGS grade anything pre-war just my preference. i had a yearly subsription once with PSA and for all that it is worth i would rather use VCP and grade elsewhere. here are my grades gai will get a DNQ (did not qualify) from me.
SGC (pre-war) 8 PSA (pre-war) 7 BGS (pre-war) 5 SGC (post war) 6 PSA (post war) 7.5 BGS (post war) 7 SGC (modern) 4 PSA (modern) 7 BGS (modern) 8.5 SGC (autographs) n/a PSA (autographs) 7 BGS/JSA (autographs) 7.5
__________________
Successful Transactions: Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911 (I’m sure I’m missing some quality members) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc - 3
psa - 3 bvg - 2 gai - 0 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
sgc - 7
bvg - 7 (liked their grading better when they had 4 sub categories, but i think they are doing better with authenticity now) psa - 3 gai - 0 (might as well be raw from an untrusted source) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
GAI gets no love so far.
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC = 7
PSA = 5 bgs/bvg = 2.5 gai = 1 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA - 7.5
SGC - 5 BVG/BGS - 4 (Unless a Jordan rookie for BGS - then a 9) GAI - 0 ISA - QUESTIONABLE? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc-88
psa 6 bgs 8 bvg 5 gai 1 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Psa 8
sgc 8 bgs 6 gai 0 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's the funniest thing I've read all day, classic!
![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Psa 8
sgc 1 bvg 7 gai 1 |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not biased one way or the other. I stick to postwar stuff so it's almost all PSA graded. I just thought it was a funny comment no matter what grading company it was aimed at. Just sayin'.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
here are my grades for an average off the street collector having submitted the cards.
SGC 86 (with Derek 88/92) PSA 6.5 BVG/BGS 3 GAI 1 Last edited by glynparson; 09-17-2011 at 08:59 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An important quallification....
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Asa-9
cta-9 pro-9 snaggletooth(actually exists)-7.3 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Derek was specifically put on this earth to grade sports cards. In all seriousness, SGC has lately taken the "harsh grading is better" model. I don't want my cards harshly graded, I want them accurately graded.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just based off of my limited experience, and what I've seen...........
SGC- 9 BVG-8 PSA-4.5 GAI- 3 ( I've only had a few and they are all crossed to equal SGC grade or bumped up a grade) The others........what others? ![]() |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll use Danny's categories and this is based on how I use them
SGC (pre-war) 10 PSA (pre-war) 9 BGS (pre-war) 3 SGC (post war) 8 PSA (post war) 9 BGS (post war) 3 SGC (modern) 5 PSA (modern) 10 BGS (modern) 10 Oversized items (largely based on cost) SGC 6 PSA 3 BGS 7 GAI is a don't use in all categories |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always get a laugh out of the occasional eBay listing that has some card slabbed by a company you never or have rarely heard of, and then if per say it's graded a 6 by them - the seller has a " = PSA 6" in the title. One guy actually adds a grade, IE: "SGC40 = PSA4"
![]() Mine... SGC 80 PSA 3MC GAI 1.5 BVG 5 PRO 0 I've seen a lot of BVG's recently graded well/consistent of late, had many of the 4 and above cross-over to same or higher on SGC (when broken out) My issues with PSA have more to do with Customer Service than the ever-growing number of cards with creases and paper-loss graded as 4's and 5's. BVG and SGC couldn't be more accommodating at the shows. PSA is like going to the Dept of Motor Vehicles - this form, in this type of sleeve, this way or get out. I asked if I could have no qualifiers on my last order w/them (aren't those the kiss of death), was told no problem at a show last year, clearly noted on my order form where they told me to put it - then get 2 back with qualifiers ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Edwolf1963; 09-19-2011 at 11:05 AM. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd grade PSA a big fat F on this one! Are you kidding me?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-PIEDMON...item588fff19f7 |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cobb has the mk qualifier, dont see it as misgraded.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Glyn...are you telling me that if you take away the MK qualifier...which affects marks on both front and back...this card should grade ex?
I see at least 2-4 creases...a stain...rounded corners...I think this is enough to disqualify this card from being graded ex...or even vg?!?! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would grade the card VG. I don't see any creases, but I do see a stain on the front (between the buttons) and the back is just "dirty."
It could have had the ST or MK qualifer, but I think the MK is the better choice since the marks are so obvious. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hmmm...perhaps my eyes are too keen to be a grader...or just too poor...BUT...I think I see a crease to the left of Ty's forehead and what appears to be a full width horizontal crease through where his moustache would be?
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC=9.0,BVG=8.0,I have no comment on PSA because I have no dealings with them.I have always received great service with SGC.The only thing holding me back from giving them a 10 is the fact that I have waited 5+ months for them to add a Ty Cobb player registry since my initial inquiry. I understand they are busy so its ok.
Last edited by Piratedogcardshows; 09-28-2011 at 07:28 PM. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im telling you i could easily see that as vgex based on the scan im looking at. 4 is not ex its vgex.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was under the impression a qualifier knocked down a grade by 1...is this no longer the case? I have no vendetta here...no axe to grind...no fight to pick...to me...this card looks way overgraded...that's all...just my opinion. Carry on...nothing to see here.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also, I think they actually knock it down 2 grades for the registry. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
in another look at it, maybe it would be vg-ex if there are no creases or wrinkles, it's fairly nice (not counting the mark)
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-28-2011 at 12:45 PM. |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Cobb is accurately graded.
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An mk qualifier would automatically be a 1 maybe a 1.5 if you requested no qualifiers, they sometimes wont even do a no qualifier on an mk card. the knock down 2 grades is only for weighting in the registry, it does not necessarily mean you can ask for no qualifiers and get that card in a holder with 2 grades lower on it.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
also as noted previously, the number on the flip is not adjusted because of a qualifier. a qualifier just means the card would grade that specific number if not for the presence of said qualifier. meaning that psa feels the cobb is vgex if not for the writing on it.
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Glyn...thanks for clarifying that for me.
pete |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() Not only does it miss the centering requirements - at least 75/25 bottom-to-top on the left side and closer to 80/20 bottom-to-top on the left side, to add insult to injury, the bottom right corner doesn't look "mint" in my opinion. On top of that, the right side is miscut about 3/4 the way up. Unbelievable! From their Grading Standards: MINT 9: Mint A PSA Mint 9 is a superb condition card that exhibits only one of the following minor flaws: a very slight wax stain on reverse, a minor printing imperfection or slightly off-white borders. Centering must be approximately 60/40 to 65/35 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the reverse. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I read this thread (see below) several weeks ago, and I think this sums it up best. Many people don't see any point in renewing their PSA membership. The several that will renew like 'jimrad' along with several others who agreed with him are doing it for all the wrong reasons. Many people aren't happy with PSA, the service, the SMR, the membership, and the grading but since they are neck deep PSA cards, they blindly support the company and basically donate $99 every year to the company for their membership hoping the company will continue to succeed. http://forums.collectors.com/message...39&STARTPAGE=1 |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There's always going to be some subjectivity to the placement of a numerical grade, but unless the card is a previously unknown issue, you should be able to identify it with 100% accuracy.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strip Card Grading, Authentic vs. Low Grade | abothebear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2011 08:23 PM |
Many Graded 1950's-1980's High Grade F/S Final reduction before Ebay... | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 07-23-2010 06:55 PM |
Top Dollar Paid For Ultra High Grade Cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2008 08:45 AM |
Change it up: Post you low grade, high grades! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-28-2006 06:58 AM |
What exactly IS high grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-06-2006 10:40 PM |