| 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks for reading this, I recently bought a 1964 Pete Rose PSA 6 graded card off ebay and I found its grade to be interesting. I am aware the grading companies are sometimes very inconsistent but I guess I am just looking for opinions from people here on the board who are more familiar with PSA's grading guidelines.  The Rose card in question has absolutely pristine corners, a clean back and no creases/wrinkles.  It is however slightly off center, appears somewhat out of focus kind of like motion blur(look at the "C" on pete's hat)?, and has a couple spots on the front of the card that appear to either be ink blotches or wax stains.  Also compared to another Rose 1964 card I have the overall color appears to be a bit more dull. Is it common for cards from this set to have print defects and/or have the picture out of focus? Shouldn't this card be graded an 8 or 9 with qualifiers or is it common practice for PSA to simply ignore the qualifiers and downgrade the card? I should also note that overall, I am fairly happy with the card but am just curious. The auction link with pic is below, any help/opinions are appreciated 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=STRK:MEWAX:IT  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Nice card by the way and as long as you're happy with it, it doesn't matter what the slab says.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks for the response David, I wasn't aware that you could request no qualifiers as I have never submitted a card on my own.  Good to know.  I did a little looking on ebay and found another 1964 card that has a very similar print defect along the side: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	http://cgi.ebay.com/1964-Topps-182-S...item3360046804 thanks again for the help  
		 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Yup, if you'll write "no qualifiers" at the top of the submission form, they will honor your request most of the time - but it usually knocks the grade down 1 or 2 points.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| 1952 Topps PSA 9 question, photos added | badger_9 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 11 | 12-25-2009 01:07 PM | 
| FS: 1956 Topps PSA graded | baltocards | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-19-2009 12:11 PM | 
| Vintage FOOTBALL for sale, plus a few non-sport and multi-sport cards | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-24-2008 02:33 PM | 
| Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 06:51 PM | 
| Lots Of HOF'ers -- Mostly Post-War | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2006 09:44 PM |