![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What does everyone think. I have a set of Detroit Wolverine PC, 6 have pinholes on the top, the rest don't.
Also have a set of the Detroit 1907 Dietsche PC, grade or not? A couple of pics below. Thanks in advance Joe
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of course grade them. The Cobb Dietsche fielding and the Wolverine Cobb batting are rare cards. I don't care if they grade 10, there is no good reason not to grade them.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed. It will protect them from any further damage as well. Slab em'...
__________________
Tony A. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitely candidates for grading.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd use the money to collect more cards, instead of slabbing the ones in hand. But if you're wanting to sell them, then grading them might be a valid strategy.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
slabhead.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
great Crawford image.
If they were my cards - I would grade them.... and would expect '1's
__________________
Joe D. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You could just sell them to me!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a waste of your money, why not buy stuff instead of giving money to dorks with an opinion?
There are plenty of ways to protect them from further damage that are way cheaper. Doug |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just sent the Cobbs to Sgc for grading. I will post pics when they come back.
Joe
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess it is a little too late to have much influence in the outcome, but I don't think you need to grade these postcards. With the pinholes they are automatically a 10 or 20 at best.
What additional information will the grades give a potential buyer? If the postcards didn't have pinholes then by all means get them graded so that a buyer can have a better idea if there are light creases, dinged corners, etc, but the pinholes downgrade the cards so far that a creased card with a pinhole will grade the same as a very nice card with the same pinhole. Jeff |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rose Company Postcards...falling off or just another economy result? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-05-2008 05:43 PM |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
Mr. Binder & Rose Co. postcards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-04-2007 10:50 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
Change it up: Post you low grade, high grades! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-28-2006 06:58 AM |