![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently purchased some vintage cards from an auction house knowing full well they were advertised as trimmed. They arrived and looked up the sizes for each card in the Standard Catalog. All the cards actually measured out the correct size . rechecked carefully both ways top to bottom . The question is can a card be trimmed yet still be the correct size ? I could understand if it was 1/16th short making it look trimmed but one actually appeared to be 1/16th larger.? Any input on this one would be appreciated! thanks , Brett
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It's part of my PC in my '76 Topps set so it really doesn't bother me to have a trimmed card. It looks a lot better now rather than having the wavy border. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, a card most definitively can be trimmed, yet measure full-size. In my area, when PSA was just getting started, there was one dealer who specialized in turning off-grade '50's and '60's cards into near mint/mint. From what I later read, the cards would be put through a paper press, slightly expanding their size, then carefully trimmed back down to size, removing worn corners and/or edges in the process. When grading took hold, the grading services pretty much eliminated this tactic.
The key is to use a loupe (I have a 16x loupe) or high-powered magnifying glass to examine the edges. If the edges display a rough cut, the card is most likely virgin and untouched. If they are wire sharp, however, the card will be rejected by the grading services as trimmed, despite the fact that they meet the standard size. Also, if the edges appear rough but seem to be pinched at the corners, the card will be rejected. I learned the hard way, by submitting what appeared to be true NMt/Mt cards to PSA, only to have them labeled trimmed. Hopes this helps, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 03-18-2011 at 09:48 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info. Trying to learn something and these forum seems to have some of the most informitive people around. Not planning on sending them for grading. These are for my PC . Used my loupe to check edges and now see what you mean about rough and smooth edges! Size really dosen't matter after all ! what exactly do you mean about pinched corners? Sorry for so many questions but if you don't ask ... Brett
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's possible to stretch just the corner, then trim to sharp. A bit more subtle than stretching the whole card. And the middle of the edge will be original.
But everything has its clues, and with just doing the corners they'll be thinner than the rest of the card. What I wonder about are cards kept in one of the original hard holder types, pre screwdown, which was a folded piece of plexiglass. Those gripped the card at one end, so if only 2 corners are thinner and tapered It might actually be Ok, but still get rejected. I'd have to know much more about what the graders are trained to look for. Steve B |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange 1975 Topps error card question | RobertGT | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-11-2009 05:39 AM |
Strange 1975 Topps error card question | RobertGT | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 05-31-2009 07:51 AM |
Grading a trimmed cabinet card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-10-2007 12:51 PM |
Question about high end graded cards being trimmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-22-2007 10:23 AM |
Ebay Seller Credit Card Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 01-28-2005 12:00 PM |