![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Would you pay more for eye appeal over the assigned grade? | |||
No, I'll only pay fair market value based on the assigned grade |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 4.21% |
Yes, I'll pay slightly more for a "high end" card |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 34.74% |
Yes, I'm willing to place a significant premium on a well centered and/or above average looking card |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
58 | 61.05% |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Since "buy the card, not the holder" is a popular phrase around here I was wondering how much of a premium eye appeal has vs. the technical grade of the card. I personally don't mind paying a premium for a card where the eye appeal exceeds the "technical grade", but I figured it would be fun to put up a poll and see what everyone else thinks.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VG E96 card with great eye appeal. Reduced | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 11-30-2007 08:37 PM |
Who SHOULD command the highest premium? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-22-2006 10:32 PM |
Uncatalogued Christy Mathewson Photo Premium | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-22-2005 04:11 PM |
cards with best eye appeal | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-13-2002 12:41 AM |
eye appeal... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-26-2002 08:23 AM |