I believe it's more likely one of the following
Peter being told something in confidence and not being the sort of person to break that confidence.
Sometimes we all learn "stuff" and it's possible disclosing "stuff" could result in a lawsuit. Which would be expensive even if there was solid evidence the info was true. Without that- and getting some "stuff" in writing is not easy, it could become very expensive and/or time consuming. Not being stupid he decides to avoid an unprovable direct accusation.
Steve B
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79
Re-read this and pretend you are someone else.
It sounds like: "I have great sources of information no one else has and never will and I will not tell you what you want to know because I do not feel like it, and you should just trust me when I say, I know the truth."
You should have thrown in a "nanny nanny boo boo" at the end to augment the legitimacy of what you were saying in that post.
|