View Single Post
  #91  
Old 04-12-2023, 04:52 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jethrod3 View Post
I wouldn't call it a fascination. I think it's more about questions regarding interpretation, questions about where the IRS could or really should draw the line, and questions about where some of us might fit in that are not dealers but maybe just most casual of sellers. We are probably talking about a figure somewhere in between the $75 and $30,000 you mentioned for the casual collector (non-dealer) that sets up occasionally at a card show, and probably much more skewed to the $75 side. Probably the guy that makes between a couple hundred dollar to maybe $1K after factoring in table costs.

So no, not likely to result in a death sentence. But officially, even for such events that parallel what you might make at an average garage sale (though admittedly most are not making money on what is sold at garage sales), I think given the current rules, not declaring what you made even as a non-dealer at a mom-and-pop tiny card show (if you made anything above basis at all) is still a violation of the tax law. It's a complicated mess for folks that buy large lots of stuff at auctions, keep 1 or 2 desired items, but try to sell the rest of the stuff so it doesn't accumulate in one's house. At a minimum, some records must be kept now, even for the most casual of sellers in that situation, because more than likely, you'll also want to sell those one or two items you may have purchased in those auctions, and in the end, you'll have to figure out basis and profit, even if those desired items may not get you more than, say, $100 if sold at a show. All of this makes me want to consider becoming a CPA when I retire from my current day job!
I wouldn't worry about trying to become a CPA after retiring if I were you. Nowadays you need the equivalent of almost a master's degree first, which then allows you to actually sit and take the standardized CPA examination administered by the AICPA (similar to the bar exam for attorneys), and then after finally passing the CPA exam, in many states you additionally now have to have so much time/years of related work experience, and only then can you actually apply for your CPA license with your applicable state board of accountancy. You can easily be talking 6-7-8, or even more years, before realistically being able to get a CPA's license. And Nic/raulus, help me out here, is the rate of people taking the CPA exam for the first time still something like 5% or less passing all parts of the exam on the first try? Not passing the exam right away can make that wait even longer.

And even if you got through all of that, it probably still wouldn't really do you any good because truth be known, when you go to college and study for becoming a CPA, one of the last things they have courses for and ever try to teach you anything about is taxes! And that is because they know full well that whatever they may teach you about taxes today, could be completely changed by the time you graduate, or even just start your next semester. And they really don't ever focus on state or local taxes, sales taxes, or anything like that much either, because with 50 states, and countless more cities, counties and so on, who knows where you're going to go and live and work after graduation? The only true way any CPA (or tax professional) really learns about taxes is by actually doing them, year after year, change after change, so they begin to fully understand the tax rules, and their impact and underlying meaning. When you go looking for someone to actually help in doing your taxes, unlike with a lot of the things that today are more geared toward technology and all the new stuff, so you normally want some more tech savvy younger people to help, you really want to look for an old fart that has been doing taxes for years and years, and use and listen to them.

And as for your discussion with Nic/raulus about casual/garage sales, and the like, don't disagree with you guys at all. The bottom line though is that at the end of the day, it always comes down to the exact same thing it seems.......MONEY! And in the case of the feds, states or city tax agents looking for and coming after people, it is all about the cost/benefit analysis. None of them really care about going after people and their casual sales, because after spending many hours, or maybe even days or weeks investigating and such, they likely end up collecting only a few bucks, at best. Meanwhile, how much time, effort, and taxpayer money have they wasted? Spending a few hundred (or a few thousand) dollars to end up collecting just $25-$50 is stupid and insane. And they actually do know better than to waste the time. The whole idea and relative definition of casual sales isn't exactly specific, but pretty much revolves around someone who is not in an actual ongoing business, set up to make profits and such to live on, occasionally selling some stuff they have (most likely at a loss from what they originally paid for it, in a typically non-business venue and/or manner). Casual sales are normally someone clearing out the closets or attic and selling the stuff from their driveway or at a flea market. And they don't typically charge more money than what they may have originally paid for that old used shirt, or beat up old chair, when they do sell it, so they normally don't make any profit at all.

But what a lot of people today utterly, and ignorantly, seem to forget and totally disregard, is how with all the technology and changing of the ways we do things anymore, the definition of when someone is considered to be in an actual business is/has also changed, whether they like it or not. Before the internet and online sellers and sales, people actually went mostly to brick-and-mortar stores and purchased items they needed and wanted. There were no questions or doubts about where the stores were located, or who was responsible for collecting/paying the sales tax, and so on. But today, with the internet and the complete transformation of the retail environment to now include the likes of Amazon, Wayfair, Overstock, and online selling venues like Ebay and Etsy, the definition of "being in an ongoing business" had to change. For the people who bitch and moan about selling a few things on Ebay every now and then, and don't want to have to report it on their taxes. Quit blaming the government and politicians. Blame people like PWCC, Probstein123, Gregg Morris Cards and other, who are actual, ongoing businesses using sites, like Ebay, to sell hundreds of millions of dollars in cards and related items annually. So, when YOU Voluntarily choose to sell your cards/items in the exact same way and manner as these other obvious, ongoing businesses do, why the hell shouldn't the various government agencies and tax authorities assume you must be in an actual business also? The tax laws had to change, along with the times and changes brought on by technology, just like when the SCOTUS had to rule on the South Dakota Vs. Wayfair case back in 2018 regarding tax nexus for state sales taxes. And because things like certain baseball cards that were considered pretty much worth very little, if anything really, just several decades ago, have suddenly skyrocketed in value in more recent times, that takes those items entirely out of the category of what had previously been considered typical casual sales type items.

And in an effort to properly collect the taxes they need to run the country, the various federal, state, and local governments have to change and adopt the tax laws and enforcement measures to keep up with the times and changing technology and how business is now being done. I've said before, if you don't want to deal with 1099-K forms and having to report occasional card sales on your tax returns, quit using the same sites and measures as all the other actual businesses do that are out there. Do the Facebook groups, B/S/T forums, card shows and such, and/or only doing deals with cash or trade, so your sales don't gets reported to tax authorities. Or maybe even better, go back to the true casual sales types of dealings and have a garage sale from home or go sell stuff at a flea market once in a while. Amazon, PWCC, Overstock, etc. owners don't go selling stuff in their driveways at home, or drag some stuff out to the occasional flea market or two.

And if you do still choose to sell cards using an online business venue, like Ebay, where you know you're liable to end up getting one of these 1099-K reporting forms, I've been saying all along that you want to make sure to not ignore it if you get one of these 1099-K forms, and to be sure to report it appropriately on your tax return. Failing to do so will absolutely result in you getting contacted by the IRS because by not reporting those 1099-K sales and showing on your tax return what you were doing and how you got them, they can only assume you are in an ongoing, valid business, just like all the other actual, large businesses that used that exact same selling venue, in the exact same way you did, to sell cards. But then when it comes to what to report or to put down on your tax return as your tax/cost basis for something you just sold, but bought years ago and now don't have a receipt or other record for, and/or can't remember what you paid for it, you estimate it as reasonably and as best you can, and put that on your tax return. The IRS doesn't want to have to deal and look at your nominal sales and potentially small profit any more than you want them to. As long as you properly file your tax return and show at least as much in sales as was reported to you on a 1099-K form, then, if the math is right and you don't make any other completely stupid mistakes or omissions that would draw attention to your tax return otherwise, the chances of the IRS ever questioning you on your card sales are going to be pretty slim, or none, at worst. They aren't going to crack down and audit everyone reporting a few thousand in sales, and thus maybe a few hundred/thousand in profits. As I stated earlier, there is really no cost/benefit for them to do so. And they are already so understaffed and overworked to begin with, they only want to go after the bigger fish, if you will, but unfortunately when they cast out the nets, you sometimes get others caught in them as well. Another way to maybe look at it is, going back to my analogy in an earlier post, like a cop most likely not ever bothering to chase and go after someone only a couple miles or so over the speed limit to give them a ticket.
Reply With Quote