View Single Post
  #18  
Old 09-26-2021, 05:48 PM
UKCardGuy's Avatar
UKCardGuy UKCardGuy is offline
Gary
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicaninmass View Post
I always hated to look and storage of signed balls. 8x 10 photos dont have that vintage look. For a player to HAVE TOUCHED his own card, and the thought of the story that went along with it, is magic to me. Long before card shows, cards would have had to have been carried to the ball park with the luck to get it signed.
I think that's a great point. But i really like signed balls, especially baseballs that show their age. For the same reasons that you give.. .i like the thought that a kid at a ballpark getting a ball signed by his heroes. I prefer old multi-signed balls for that reason. Bright white balls autographed on the sweet spot in sharpie might grade well, but they're just a bit saccharine to me.

I have a feeling that most of the signed cards we see (even older vintage cards) were signed at a modern card show.
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1955B, 1956T, 1965T, 1975T Mini
Reply With Quote