Quote:
Originally Posted by richtree
Hey all,
I have been working on a side project for a few months now.
I am attempting to to build a list of the Top 100 Errors and Variations based on the impact they had to the hobby.
I have a few drafts ready, but the reason for this post is two requests if anyone would like to help me.
#1 I began collected in 1985 and don't really remember anything prior to that time period. I was wondering from people collecting in the 70s and early 80s were there error cards that impacted the hobby ? Were some well known or considered important at the time that are no longer discussed ?
#2 I would love to hear what people would consider a card that needs to be on the top 50 list (besides many of the obvious).
If there are any volunteers that want to discuss deeper and share some of the drafts offline feel free to email me or inbox me (or let me know that I can contact you)....
It seems of late there has been more interest in these cards again and I feel I am ready to dive in deeper and would love to discuss with others on the board that either have the same passion or willing to share their historical knowledge...
thanks and happy new year to all !
rich t
richtree@gmail.com |
Rich:
To answer part of your questions above, YES, there were error cards collected, discussed, and written about not only in the 70's and 80's but also in the 60's when I started collecting.
Back then we had 54 Bowman #66 Williams and Piersall, 49 Leaf Hermanski and Hermansk, Alberson with both sleeves, 50 Bowman with and without bottom line on reverse, 62 Topps green tints to name just a few.
There was actually an E&V booklet printed and issued by old time collector from Philadelphia named Irv Lerner and later another by Ralph Nozaki titled Errors and Variations 1948-1976 which I still have.
So E&V's have been part of the hobby for quite awhile, probably even before the 60's.
If you have a list you want to post here, I am sure you will get comments, additions, corrections to that list to help you solidify what you are looking for.