View Single Post
  #220  
Old 02-09-2017, 11:47 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
The bottom line is this. PSA said it was a 7...twice now. I think most of us agree (and I've already said it too) it doesn't look like a 7. To most of us, it looks over graded. The PSA apologists can't blame this one on a "mechanical error". So what do you want to happen at this point? PSA is not going to change the grade. What good is b!tching about it doing? Let me ask again, what do you want to happen at this point???
do we really know psa re-reviewed this card? seemed like a statement made to appease especially in light of no response from the AH?