Quote:
Originally Posted by drcy
A sensible response is not to spend $200,000.00 for a 1957 Topps Sandy Koufax or $15,000.00 for a 1980 Topps Rickey Henderson because it's in a PSA 10 holder.
Of course, then, that would have been the sensible thing to do in the first place.
|
I always assumed those that spent that kind of money had that kind of money?
What I hated to see/read about were those who took out loans or paid the sellers monthly payment amounts in order to get a desired card.
Personally, I've seen some cards that I definitely wanted but due to their price, even if I didn't have to take out a loan, there was just no way I was going to drop that kind of money.
Off topic but does anyone else now view 8's and 9's and especially 10's in a different light?
I was told about some cards for sale currently at an auction house that I looked into. In a lot was a PSA 9 card that of course looked great but in doing so, my first reaction was, it's likely been doctored.
