View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-06-2001, 11:44 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Here is the question

Posted By: petecld

What a gutless response on Billingsley's part.

If describing them as being "short" was enough then why didn't Lew sell them that way too?

I don't think Lew went through the trouble of selling the cards because he had nothing else to do that month. I'm sure he, as any auction house would, wanted the highest possible price and would know that selling them as trimmed meant less money then selling a them as "short". But selling them as "short" when in fact he knew otherwise constituted fraud.

Do you really think that someone with a complete set, ANY SET, of cards where ALL of the cards are "short" is coincidence?

Reply With Quote