No,
Based on PSA's explanations, a photo of a photo IS a duplicate negative. So Type III......or type IV if created more then two years after the original image was taken.
It's all pretty silly and arbitrary anyways. The idea that any Type III is always inferior to a Type I, is pure bunk. Most publicity and promotional studio shots and premiums from the first half of the 20th century are not technically Type I's, although they are often described as such.
Many are sought after by collectors.
The work done on them is often far superior then plenty of Type I shots that you might see offered from press archives.
As always it depends on the subject of the photo, the quality of the print, the age of the print and many other factors as far as value or desirability goes.
|