[timn1]

Hi Leon,
They must have gotten some flak from others as well-- they did from me. Here's their reply to my neutrally phrased questions. I think the Morehouse idea came up because they were looking around on VCP to find their card and just happened to see Morehouse before any of the other M101 backs. The fake part of it is obviously more of an issue.

"Here are some reasons why I think the card is real. I bought the card at an estate auction of a multimillionaire. I don't see any reason why he would be selling fakes. I bought a 1964 Cleveland Browns Team photo in a frame with every autograph except Lou Groza and that one was authenticated, so hopefully that will give you an idea of the caliber of collectibles he had. Also, the 1916 Morehouse Baking Walter Johnson isn't one of the more popular Walter Johnson cards. If someone was making a reproduction they would probably do it on something like the 1909-1911 T206. This one is later in his career and it comes from a food product. It isn't a tobacco card. There is also a picture to compare with on vintagecardprices.com which I use for identification purposes. Another factor is the general appearance of the card. Usually I can spot fakes and I rip them up. I just ripped up an 1888 Allen and Ginter Charles Comiskey where the gloss was trying to be removed with sandpaper. It seemed obvious to me. There is no scatched off gloss or obviously cut corners on this card. It hasn't been altered. I am almost sure this is the real deal and if you looked at the card itself I think you'd agree. There are all types of oddities with these old cards. I'm fairly certain I've seen an 1880's Allen and Ginter Mike Kelly blank back authenticated by PSA selling on ebay. Those are reasons why I think it is real. Hopefully some of these reasons help a little bit. Thanks for your question."